search for: filesytems

Hi, I have been seeing data corruption on the ZFS filesystem. Here are some details. The machine is running s10 on X86 platform with a single 160Gb SATA disk. (root on s0 and zfs on s7) ...Sanjaya --------- /etc/release ---------- -bash-3.00# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86 Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights

I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem. The client is Solaris 9 U7. I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it. showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone. the dfstab file has option rw set. So what gives? Phillip -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to 20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it seems no other native Linux FS supports it. My question are: Is ZFS stable? How does it scale for very large filesytems, ie, 2TB to 9TB? How is the performance of fuse? I plan to use it on my archive server first, so data reliability is very important Any thoughts or ideas? TIA

...[ OK ] * Starting deferred execution scheduler [ OK ] * Starting CPU interrupts balancing daemon [ OK ] * Starting crash report submission daemon [ OK ] * Starting Block the mounting event for NFS filesytems until statd is ru[ OK ] * Stopping Block the mounting event for NFS filesytems until statd is ru[ OK ] * Starting libvirt daemon [ OK ] * Exporting directories for NFS kernel daemon... [ OK ] * Stopping save kernel messages...

There''s been another sighting of ZFS on Mac. The latest developer release of Leopard (Mac OS 10.5) has a dialogue box calling out the "Zettabyte File System (ZFS)" as an option. The first publication I saw this is a French website called Mac4Ever - http://mac4ever.com/ news/27485/zettabyte_sur_leopard/ I put up a Babelfish translation at my site, http://storagemojo.com/?

Does Samba have any max filesytem limitations. In particular can both 2.2.8 and 3.0 support 2TB+ filesystems. For now, I am thinking of 6TB max, so I don't need to know about Petabytes or Exabytes. The other side of the question, is can Win9x, Win2K, etc. work with filesystems over 2 TB. If the above is in a FAQ somewhere, a url would be great. Greg -- Greg Freemyer

...or the kernel. Any attempt to > use xattrs in that namesspace will fail with EOPNOTSUPP, regardless of > priveleges." > > Can you check with 4.8.x ? I guess that statement may not be correct, depending on which kernel subsystem exposes the xattr? My testing was with local filesytems, not with nfsv4 mounts. Apparantly it works with nfs4_getfacl|nfs4_setfacl... -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ GPG Key Fingerprint: FAE2 C608 8A24 2520 51C5 59E4 AA1E 9B7...

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the

...upgrade from 5.3 (original install) to 5.4. Saturday night, /etc/cron.weekly reported the following: /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md0 md0 holds /boot and resides, mirrored, on sda1 and sdb1. md1 holds an LVM volume containing the remaining filesytems, including swap. The underlying hardware is just a few months hold, has passed the usual memtest stuff, and has been running 5.3 well for a few months. I'm *guessing* that due to the timing, this is related to the upgrade. I have to admit that I forgot myself and instead of doing the glibc up...

Hi, When attempting to restore to LINUX RHEL5 - OCFS2 filesystem received the following error during RMAN restore for nearly all of the datafiles attempted to restore with exception of a couple of smaller datafiles which were smaller < 2GB. ORA-19870: error reading backup piece /db/dumps/TR1_1/rmanbackup/TR1_88_1 ORA-19502: write error on file "/db/devices/db1/PR2/pr2_1/pr2.data1",

...and they run stock CentOS 6.4, fully patched (not yet migrated to 6.5). The VM disk images are housed on an NFS server. None of the VMs is particularly resource-hungry. They run a variety of Linux distros: CentOS 5/6, Debian 6/7. I'll start to see the VMs fail to write files to their local filesytems. No machine in the chain has rebooted or been updated in any significant way, but the root filesystem is off-limits. (This will happen on just one of our servers; the other VM platforms run without issue.) In /var/log/messages, I'll see the following entry for each impacted VM: <date&g...

Hello Gordon, Thursday, December 11, 2014, 5:23:56 PM, you wrote: GM> The system will mount a GM> filesytem on top of an existing path, including one with another GM> filesystem at the same path. But the mounts are identical- \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs

Hi all, How to reserve a space on a zfs filesystem? For mkfiel or dd will write data to the block, it is time consuming. whiel "mkfile -n" will not really hold the space. And zfs''s set reservation only work on filesytem, not on file? Could anyone provide a solution for this? Thanks very much Vincent

hi all I am using Ubuntu Dapper at the moment (after using windows for so long) dualbooting alongside windows So i have all my games and applications for windows... One of those games is Grand Theft Auto San Andreas. Using wine i'm trying to run gtasa from my windows partiton (yes it is NTFS filesystem) and it keeps telling me that it couldn't find the sound card. So can someone tell

Hi All,I need help with the following problems:The system might suffer a power loss when I run a program. After the reboot process, it has happened, this prompt is issued on the filesystem check failed. This message appears:*** An error occurred during the file system check*** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot*** when you leave the shellGive root password for maintenance(or type

Hi I am trying to Run AsteriskNow 1.5 which uses Centos 5.3 Distribution with Readonly Root Filesytem. Right now if I shutdown the system abrupty or there is power failure linux kernel doesn't not boot "Kernel panic" and other short of issues.prb due to corrupted files. Thats why i want to make root filesystem as read-only and placing some directories /var and /etc/asterisk etc as

Hi, I'm running Samba as a PDC for 1 year it works great. I have one question. In this time we need for some applications Extended Attributes (EA), users can read, write, but not delete files. These applications are written in Pascal (DOS mode) :o((. Can anyone tell me, if RSBAC or LSM or any other similar project can help ne with this problem? Can Samba work with these EA? Thanks,

Hello. I am trying to set up SAMBA 3.x on FC4. SAMBA will be PDC with no other server. I work at a K-12 school, so unless I want 20 episodes of "Family Guy" in a student's folder, I need to set quotas. I've been looking around for 2 days and I'm stumped. I found something called smbcquotas, but it seems to apply to a mixed NT server environment. I heard rumors of configure

Solaris OS has ZFS as primary filesystem, that has own implementation of ACL (NFS v4 ACL). Samba uses zfsacl and acl_xattr modules for converting NT ACL to ZFS ACL and extended attributes of file in this OS. ZfsOnLinux team ported ZFS as a number of kernel-linked modules to Linux OS, so ZFS on Linux supports NFS ACL, deduplication, compresson and other features of Solaris ZFS v.28. But NFS ACL is

...messpace will fail with EOPNOTSUPP, regardless of > > > priveleges." > > > > > > Can you check with 4.8.x ? > > > > I guess that statement may not be correct, depending on which kernel subsystem > > exposes the xattr? My testing was with local filesytems, not with nfsv4 > > mounts. Apparantly it works with nfs4_getfacl|nfs4_setfacl... > > Ah, my guess is there's a missing check in the kernel > NFSv4 redirector somewhere. Anyway, we can't use system.XXX > namespace if it doesn't work on local filesystems on > Linux....