search for: fileindexer

I just installed java-sdk using yum. When I try to execute the following, I get an exception error: root at blh fileIndexer]# java -Xmx256m -jar FileIndexer-1.1.5.jar Warning: -Xmx256m not understood. Ignoring. Warning: -jar not understood. Ignoring. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: How can I fix this? Raymond

Greetings. I've got a poorly conceived and implemented system I'm trying to migrate off of. Right now we've got 20K accounts or so, in mbox form, under UW-IMAP. Eventually we're going to move to Maildir format, but the first step is to move to Dovecot on one of our imap servers as a proof of concept. In other words, all config changes have to take place on the dovecot

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Add support for clover / OpenCL kernel input parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> > --- > .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_from_tgsi.cpp | 18 +++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 03/10/2016 04:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Add support for clover / OpenCL kernel input parameters. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de

Some of the lowering steps we currently do for FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL only apply to buffers, making it impossible to use FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for OpenCL global buffers. This commits changes the buffer code to use FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER at the ir_from_tgsi and lowering steps, freeing use of FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for use with OpenCL global buffers. Note that after lowering buffer accesses use the

Is there a way to change the name of the .subscriptions file that dovecot looks for to .mailboxlist to be compatible with WU-IMAP? It would be handy for testing and conversion if you had that. BTW - I'm a new user and your software is very well designed. -- Marc Perkel - marc at perkel.com Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com

This approach leads to the emitters needing to know about both global and buffer, even though at that point, they are identical. I was thinking that in the lowering logic, buffer would just get rewritten as global (with the offset added), thus not needing any change to the emitters. What do you think about such an approach? On Mar 16, 2016 2:24 AM, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede at

How can i replicate this in Linux: source(file.choose()) I've tried source(tkgetOpenFile()) but with no luck

FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL is currently only used for buffer handling, as we do not yet have (opencl) global memory support. Global memory support actually requires some different handling during lowering, so rename FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL to FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER to reflect that the current code is for buffer handling, this will allow the later (re-)addition of FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for regular global memory.

Hi, On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? > Could you please double-check that? I just checked: lspci: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 610] (rev a1) Before this patch-set: [hans at plank piglit]$ ./piglit run -o shader -t '.*arb_shader_storage_buffer_object.*' results/shader

Hi, On 16-03-16 15:55, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > This approach leads to the emitters needing to know about both global and > buffer, even though at that point, they are identical. I was thinking that > in the lowering logic, buffer would just get rewritten as global (with the > offset added), thus not needing any change to the emitters. What do you > think about such an approach? I was

tgsi_default_instruction_memory / tgsi_build_instruction_memory were returning uninitialized memory for tgsi_instruction_memory.Texture and tgsi_instruction_memory.Format. Note 0 means not set, and thus is a correct default initializer for these. Fixes: 3243b6fc97 ("tgsi: add Texture and Format to tgsi_instruction_memory") Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>

This little "hack" fixes the use of OpenCL global memory buffers with nouveau, but clearly the #if 0 is not a solution as it breaks buffers with GLSL. The reason I'm posting this as an RFC patch is to discuss how to solve this properly, 2 solutions come to mind: 1) Use separate nv50_ir::FILE_MEMORY_xxx values for buffers versus TGSI_FILE_MEMORY with TGSI_MEMORY_TYPE_GLOBAL,

Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? Could you please double-check that? One minor comment below. On 03/17/2016 05:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Some of the lowering steps we currently do for FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL only > apply to buffers, making it impossible to use FILE_MEMORY_GLOBAL for > OpenCL global buffers. > > This commits changes the buffer code to use

Hi, On 08-04-16 18:14, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 04/08/2016 12:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>> Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? >>> Could you please double-check that? >> >> I just checked: >> >> lspci: >> 01:00.0 VGA compatible

On 04:27 PM - Mar 10 2016, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 03/10/2016 04:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > >>Add support for clover / OpenCL kernel input parameters. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> > >>--- > >>

Hi, On 14-03-16 16:05, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > There's a less hacky and more hacky way forward. The more hacky solution is > to set file index to -1 or something and then not do the lowering when you > see that. > > The less hacky solution is the one you proposed as #1 - introduce a new > file for "buffer" memory and lower it to the global file by adding a base >

When support for decl.Atomic and .Shared was added, tgsi_build_declaration was not updated to propagate these properly. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Changes in v2: -Add Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/tgsi_build.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6

On 04/08/2016 12:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi? >> Could you please double-check that? > > I just checked: > > lspci: > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT > 610] (rev a1) > > Before this patch-set: >

Could you please get rid of the cosmetic changes (eg. the switch ones)? Because this doesn't really improve readability and in my opinion these changes should be eventually done in a separate patch. Other than that, this patch is : Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> Yes, this probably won't work as is for atomic operations but the lowering pass is