search for: filechanges

Hi all, I've just managed to upgrade to Samba 3.3 and am pretty ecstatic about finding i can now use FileSystemWatcher to watch for file changes in a directory. On a Windows system however, when I say 'watch $dir' with watchsubdirectories == true and $dir/a/file.jpg is changed, I get a filechanged notification - on Samba 3.3 this doesn't happen - does anyone know if it's

Hi All, I am current working on Samba + LDAP PDC in RHEL-4. I some problem when doing the smbldap-useradd -w command. When I have a WinXP box try to join the PDC, smbldap-useradd -w "%u" will add a workstation account to the LDAP tree with all POSIX attribute but without all the SambaSAMAccount attribute. So, the WinXP box can find it's workstation account and wouldn't

BTW, I am using samba-client-2.0.7-4 and Redhat Linux 6.1 (linux 2.2.12-20). -Sudheer Sudheer Tumuluru wrote: > Hi, > I have an NT machine running an application which refreshes a > text file every minute or so with fresh data. The directory containing > this file is shared so that I can do an smbmount. I have a linux machine > which runs a program to interpret this file.

Hi, I would like to implement macro debug info support in LLVM. Below you will find 4 parts: 1. Background on what does it mean to debug macros. 2. A brief explanation on how to represent macro debug info in DWARF 4.0. 3. The suggested design. 4. A full example: Source -> AST -> LLVM IR -> DWARF. Feel free to skip first two parts if you think you know the background.

Hi, I want to clone my hardisk containing the centos-5.3 OS and its swap region on to new raw hardisk via network either through ssh, tftp or ftp. How do i do that ? Is there any Tool for that or will DD command be sufficient.I know that dd command will have to be used on hardisk with already existing partitions and not on raw disk. Regards, Premraj M Disclaimer : This message is

The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning. The list below details the changes in this release. You can get the source code from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course. For the R Core Team, Peter Dalgaard

The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning. The list below details the changes in this release. You can get the source code from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course. For the R Core Team, Peter Dalgaard

The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning. The list below details the changes in this release. You can get the source code from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course. For the R Core Team, Peter Dalgaard

> Do we really need to touch the AST? Or would it be reasonable to wire up the CGDebugInfo directly to the PPCallbacks, if it isn't already? (perhaps it is already wired up for other reasons?) This sound as a good idea, I will check that approach. PPCallbacks is only an interface, has nothing connected to it, but we will create a new class, which implement PPCallbacks, for macros. So we can

> Not necessarily, if we kept the macros in order in the list of macros attached to the CU, which I imagine we would. OK, now I understand what you are aiming for. I really do not favor one on the other. But, can you explain what is the advantage of the parent approach over the children approach? If any, the children approach seems to be the one reduces the LLVM IR size, is not it? Regards,

> Right - I was wondering if CGDebugInfo already implemented PPCallbacks or was otherwise being notified of PPCallback related things, possibly through a layer or two of indirection. I checked the approach of skipping representing macros in AST, and communicate them directly from Parser to CGDebugInfo. However, I could not find a way to initialize this communication. The only interface

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> wrote: > I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them directly > in CGDebugInfo through PPCallbacks during preprocessing. > > To do that, I needed to extend ASTConsumer interface with this extra > method: > > > > /// If the consumer is interested in notifications from

I'd like to jump in. I do not work on a preprocessor based language, but have the same code expansion problem to encode. Right now, we hack around the problem by appending some prefix after the file name and pretend it is a different file, which is not great. I understand you want to represent expansion by DIFileMacro ? I'm not how this is supposed to be used and it is not in the example.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them

Hello, It's probably quite troll-risky to put a title like this, but did anyone take the trouble to compare Lucene to Xapian and make a list of differences? As I told the list at the end of last year, I'm going to have to integrate an indexing/search engine in the coming weeks or months. It will be integrated to Dokeos, an open-source e-learning application in PHP, and at the moment we