search for: filecab

...just now to debug this as we're registered partners (for testing Samba/LDAP etc.). We now have a massive thread going in the private Vista 4-hr response support forums and we're on to log files debugging Vista side. We've cleared CSC etc. applied the following: http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/archive/2007/03/16/using-offline-files-with-samba-emc-servers-nas-devices.aspx We applied the registry patch and oplocks settings (even though most are on by default). The map settings olny allowed directories to be shown for some reason though, so we disabled. For now the customer has switched ba...

...at just works better!)? I've attached my smb.conf I do understand that this is the Samba list and not a Windows support list, but M$ aren't interested in helping Samba users ;-) Notes: - I've updated the registry to round up write times as documented on http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2007/03/16/using-offline-files-with-samba-emc-servers-nas-devices.aspx - I follows the Samba wiki to enable Domain Compatibility Mode to join Windows 7 to the domain. - There are two users on Windows XP Home which access the Shared files without being domain members. No users Domain/Non...

On 09/08/2017 01:31 PM, hw wrote: > Mark Haney wrote: > > I/O is not heavy in that sense, that?s why I said that?s not the > application. > There is I/O which, as tests have shown, benefits greatly from low > latency, which > is where the idea to use SSDs for the relevant data has arisen from.? > This I/O > only involves a small amount of data and is not sustained

Is there any reason to believe that a samba server would be slower when serving up roaming profiles than a real Windows server? I know roaming profiles are slow by nature and that there are things you can do to help like configuring ffolder redirection. But all else being equal, how would a samba server compare to a Windows server when it comes to speed specifically with respect to roaming

Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented