search for: file_system_support

Hello , ( samba 4.6.9 - centos 6 DC1 centos DC2 ) I tried to sync sysvol as described in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround between two DC but rsync shows some errors like this rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(apam-ad.apam.it/Policies/{D725AAC4-27E8-46AC-918D-55B560988386}/Machine/Applications/{031B2C75-D832-429B-B4C4-226BAA665E3A}.aas,

Hey, I refer to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Operating_system_requirements/File_system_support#ext4 Wiki suggests: Ensure that your kernel has the following options enabled: CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y My debian 8.2 installation was installed from netinstall CD, all updates applied. All my filesystems are ext4 and xattr and acl are not set,...

Hi Anybody out there is using ACL with file systems without xattr support ?? I read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support and added posix:eadb = /var/lib/samba/private/eadb.tdb to my smb.conf, but samba does not create this file. Can someone post a working example of this setup, please? Any mandatory "vfs objects" for this to work? (yes, I read and understood the pitfalls along this path) Regards Eth...

...r information requires real root which is why it won't work with an unprivileged container. If what is said in that discussion is true, then the only workaround for a non privileged container is to assume no support for xattr and use posix:eadb in smb.conf. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support#File_systems_without_xattr_support Not recommended, though, as it comes with a significant performance hit. There seems to be anecdotal evidence, however, that xattr may work even with an unprivileged container when btrfs is used. https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/2708#issuecomment-473466062...

...objects = acl_xattr" (possibly too old version [Version 4.13.13-Debian] for the needed "acl_xattr:security_acl_name = user.samba" option needed if running in a non-priv container). So I tried "vfs objects = acl_tdb" and found it working. In https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support I found: File systems without xattr support Note: This is not recommended!!! If you don't have a filesystem with xattr support, you can simulate it by adding the following line to your smb.conf: posix:eadb = /usr/local/samba/private/eadb.tdb This will place all extra file attrib...

...but this makes no difference. >It wouldn't, amongst the defaults for EXT4 are 'acl' & 'user_xattr' and >it shouldn't matter if the shares are on a different partition. > >Rowland I agree. Yet it does. I just did the tests on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support , which went successfull, so my EXT4 volume has the necessary attributes activated. For Samba there must exist a difference in between my root volume and my data volume.   This is my smb.conf currently:   # Global parameters [global] netbios name = LX01 realm = DOMAIN.COM workgroup = DOMAIN dns f...

Am 07.09.18 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:22:36 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> At a customer server (gentoo linux, so far only Samba version 4.7.7) >> we tried to use Windows ACLs and failed: >> >> no security tab in Windows ... for local C: yes, not on

Hello, 1) fs acl support I use XFS I did the tests ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support ) and no errors [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -d test.txt # file: test.txt user.test="test" [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt # file: test.tx...

...server. Some users had no issues, which is the puzzling bit Re the OS and file system: I had a look at the following document regarding the file system support. It mentions something like adding the posix:eadb = /usr/local/samba/private/eadb.tdb to smb.conf file https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support As mentioned, we got the following during the migration ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires. Try the mounting the filesystem with the 'acl' optio...

On 04/10/15 18:20, oeh univie edv lists wrote: > Hey, > > I refer to > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Operating_system_requirements/File_system_support#ext4 > > Wiki suggests: > Ensure that your kernel has the following options enabled: > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > > My debian 8.2 installation was installed from netinstall CD, all updates > applied. All my filesystem...

>Adding a pointer record for the server didn't help either. I am going to test another Windows PC now to see if the problem exists there as well. > >  >BC I just realized that I omitted an important piece of information and that is that I am using a separate EXT4 volume for my shares. I just did a test and it seems that shares on the same volume as sysvol and netlogon funtion as

...>It wouldn't, amongst the defaults for EXT4 are 'acl' & 'user_xattr' > >and it shouldn't matter if the shares are on a different partition. > > > >Rowland > > I agree. Yet it does. I just did the tests > on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support , which went > successfull, so my EXT4 volume has the necessary attributes > activated. For Samba there must exist a difference in between my root > volume and my data volume. No, it shouldn't matter, here is the proof that it works: smbclient -L dc1 Enter rowland's password: An...

...eebsd and failed for precisely the same reason as yours, NFSv4 ACLs. These do not work with a Samba AD DC. It used to be possible to use the deprecated ntvfs server, but this is no longer built by default. If your filesystem can use acls and passes the tests here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support#Testing_your_filesystem then it should provision as a DC, but as I said, unless things have changed, you will not be able to provision a DC on Freebsd or distros based on it. Rowland

...mba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens mj via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 3 november 2017 9:51 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sysvol replcation rsync error > > Hi, > > Does your fs support xattr? > > Check here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support > > MJ > > On 11/03/2017 08:41 AM, Giuseppe Arvati via samba wrote: > > Hello , > > > > ( samba 4.6.9 - centos 6 DC1  centos DC2 ) > > > > I tried to sync sysvol as described in > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replica...

On Mon, 13 May 2019 17:40:00 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 13/05/2019 17:05, Steve Litt via samba wrote: [snip] > > Any advice on how to perform this mount without -o vers=1.0 would be > > greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > SteveT > > > Steve, Your version of Samba is too old, it only

On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 20:18, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 31/05/2020 17:55, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > It's just what's there from a default Ubuntu (minimal) install... It > > looks like snapd depends on it. Anyway, I don't need either here, so I > > removed it entirely. The issue persists, though. > > Did you

...n a DC: ldbsearch -H ldap://dc3 '(samaccountname=Domain Admins)' -UAdministrator Replace 'dc3' with the DC's name. It should display the Domain Admins object > > At 2:30pm we plan to reboot into the other kernel. > > See here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support If it passes the tests there, you should be good to go. Rowland

....I pointed this out and > get nothing but crickets. It definitely works on an Ubuntu 18.04 distro, it just seems to be a problem with your SoC. Have you read this: https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18.04-samba-AD_DC.txt And this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support > > Thank you for pointing out that Samba 4.7.6 uses Python 2.7.? I have > specifically tried to find this through innumerable searches and found > nothing that answers this. - Is it still using Samba 3 python code > (samba.samba3.smbd.set_nt_acl), or is there a way to make it us...

...ad in > the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL > utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it. > On the ZFS machine, are you using 'vfs_zfsacl' ? On the ext3 (why ext3 not ext4 ?) have you read this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support#ext3 and are you using 'vfs_acl_xattr' ? Rowland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

...> > It should display the Domain Admins object The DC there is a windows server ... I think: no -> # ldbsearch -H ldap://dc1 '(samaccountname=Domain Admins)' -UAdministrator [..] # returned 3 records # 0 entries # 3 referrals > See here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support > > If it passes the tests there, you should be good to go. yes, I know, ext4 -> ok I had to return to the former kernel because my newer kernel with its lpfc module could not talk correctly to the SAN. Booted older kernel and have to research that first. Sure I could enable the 2 pa...