search for: file_share_delet

...mba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/nttrans.c samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c --- samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/nttrans.c 2006-06-23 08:16:49.000000000 -0500 +++ samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c 2007-01-30 15:00:45.000000000 -0600 @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ if (lp_acl_check_permissions(SNUM(conn)) && (share_access & FILE_SHARE_DELETE) && (access_mask & DELETE_ACCESS)) { #endif - status = can_delete(conn, fname, file_attributes, bad_path, True); + status = can_delete(conn, fname, file_attributes, bad_path, True, False); /* We're only going to fail here if it's access denied, as that's the...

...mba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/nttrans.c samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c --- samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/nttrans.c 2006-06-23 08:16:49.000000000 -0500 +++ samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c 2007-01-30 15:00:45.000000000 -0600 @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ if (lp_acl_check_permissions(SNUM(conn)) && (share_access & FILE_SHARE_DELETE) && (access_mask & DELETE_ACCESS)) { #endif - status = can_delete(conn, fname, file_attributes, bad_path, True); + status = can_delete(conn, fname, file_attributes, bad_path, True, False); /* We're only going to fail here if it's access denied, as that's the...

...nabling strict renames does not change anything.? Yes it prevents from > renaming a directory if a file is open inside.? But not renaming a plain > file which is locked. oh, you mean just rename a plain file that is currently opened by some client? That is possible as long as all opens pass FILE_SHARE_DELETE. What kind of "lock" where you referring at in your initial mail? -slow -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba...

...time? > > Solution: > Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. > > > (Potential) problem #5: > The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? > > If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘ren...

...to rename to the same file at the same time? Solution: Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. (Potential) problem #5: The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘rename’ fails,...

...gt; > *Solution:* > Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. > > > *(Potential) problem #5:* > The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO > heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its > flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the > file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag > supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it > supported on WINE? On FAT32? > > If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not suppor...

...e to the same file at the same time? Solution: Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. (Potential) problem #5: The implementation of the function 'rename' on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the 'rename'...

...to rename to the same file at the same time? Solution: Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. (Potential) problem #5: The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘rename’ fails,...

...olution: >> Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. >> >> >> (Potential) problem #5: >> The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? >> >> If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported,...

...time? > > Solution: > Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. > > > (Potential) problem #5: > The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? > > If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘ren...

...> Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. > > > > > > *(Potential) problem #5:* > > The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO > heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its > flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the > file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag > supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it > supported on WINE? On FAT32? > > > > If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is...

16.03.2024 20:11, Ralph Boehme wrote: > On 3/16/24 14:18, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> So I'm trying to go exactly the opposite route: I'm mounting a samba >> share on linux (with cifs, see $subject). > > ah, missed that. Had read it as if you were acting on the Samba server directly. > > This smells like "strict rename" isn't enabled ? it isn't

...9;'t figure out how to read back out of the buffer (nor am I exactly sure what to pass as a buffer in the first place). Here''s the basic approach. // Get a handle to the directory. hDir = CreateFile( lpPathName, FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY, FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE|FILE_SHARE_DELETE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS, NULL ); if(hDir == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) { rb_raise(cChangeNotifyError,ErrorDescription(GetLastError())); } if(!ReadDirectoryChangesW( hDir, Buf, sizeof(Buf), bWatchSubtree,...

Hi all, I''ve checked in some code to win32-changenotify. Unfortunately, it doesn''t work right. I need some help. I don''t understand what, exactly, I''m supposed to pass to ReadDirectoryChangesW() for the 2nd argument, nor how to read the data back out. There''s also a WCHAR issue that needs to be worked out with regards to the FileName

This question isn't directly Samba related, but Samba has helped me figure out part of the problem. When I CreateFile on an existing file like so: CreateFile(FileName, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_DELETE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); Samba shows that I have the file opened with this type of lock DENY_NONE 0x20089 RDONLY When the file is locked in this manner, I am unable to rename the file. However, Windows launches executables over Samba shares with the lock: DENY_...

...to rename to the same file at the same time? Solution: Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. (Potential) problem #5: The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘rename’ fails,...

Am 5/9/20 um 3:32 PM schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > I have a WIP fix for master, can you give it a whirl? here it is. -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

...> Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. > > > > > > *(Potential) problem #5:* > > The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO > heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its > flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the > file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag > supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it > supported on WINE? On FAT32? > > > > If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is...

...names does not change anything.? Yes it prevents from >> renaming a directory if a file is open inside.? But not renaming a plain >> file which is locked. > > oh, you mean just rename a plain file that is currently opened by some client? That is possible as long as all opens pass FILE_SHARE_DELETE. What kind > of "lock" where you referring at in your initial mail? Exactly, just a plain file. For example, an executable (.exe) file which is currently running by some windows client, like this (from smbstatus): Locked files: Pid User(ID) DenyMode Access R/W...

...to rename to the same file at the same time? Solution: Solutions #1, #2 and #3 for problem #3 will take care of problem #4. (Potential) problem #5: The implementation of the function ‘rename’ on Windows used by ThinLTO heavily depends on the function CreateFileW or, to be more exact, on its flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE being supported and working correctly on *all* the file systems that can be mounted on Windows. Is the FILE_SHARE_DELETE flag supported on all non-native Windows file systems that we care about? Is it supported on WINE? On FAT32? If the flag FILE_SHARE_DELETE is not supported, the ‘rename’ fails,...