search for: fifo_fil

...ailed semodule: Failed! # cat nagios.te module nagios 1.0; require { type nagios_t; type sbin_t; type ping_t; type initrc_var_run_t; type var_t; type httpd_nagios_script_t; class dir { read write search add_name remove_name }; class fifo_file { write getattr read create }; class file { rename setattr read create write getattr unlink }; } #============= httpd_nagios_script_t ============== allow httpd_nagios_script_t var_t:fifo_file { write getattr }; allow httpd_nagios_script_t var_t:file { read getattr }; #============= nagi...

...class capability { sys_nice chown }; class file { append create execute execute_no_trans \ getattr ioctl link lock read rename setattr write unlink }; class dir { add_name getattr create read remove_name \ rename write search setattr rmdir }; class fifo_file { getattr write }; class filesystem getattr; class sock_file write; class unix_stream_socket { connectto getattr read write }; } #============= dovecot_t =============== allow dovecot_t home_root_t:file { create getattr link lock \ read rename setattr unlink write }; allo...

...:object_r:xauth_exec_t:s0 tclass=process type=AVC msg=audit(1326381080.364:610): avc: denied { write } for pid=3487 comm="xauth" path="pipe:[21744]" dev=pipefs ino=21744 scontext=system_u:system_r:xauth_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:rshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=fifo_file type=AVC msg=audit(1326381080.369:611): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=3487 comm="xauth" path="socket:[21700]" dev=sockfs ino=21700 scontext=system_u:system_r:xauth_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:inetd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=tcp_socket The output from audit2a...

...arch rmdir open } ; allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : lnk_file { ioctl read write create getattr setattr lock append unlink link rename } ; allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : sock_file { ioctl read write create getattr setattr lock append unlink link rename open } ; allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : fifo_file { ioctl read write create getattr setattr lock append unlink link rename open } ; May be the needed functionality is already there and all this discussion is the equivalent of shooting a gun on sparrows.

...in tmpfile : file { ioctl read getattr lock append } ; allow domain configfile : file { ioctl read getattr lock open } ; allow domain configfile : dir { ioctl read getattr lock search open } ; allow domain configfile : lnk_file { read getattr } ; allow domain rpm_transition_domain : fifo_file { ioctl read write getattr lock append } ; allow domain base_ro_file_type : file { ioctl read getattr lock open } ; Looking for sysctl.conf's type : # for m in tmpfile configfile rpm_transition_domain base_ro_file_type ; do echo ${m}:$(seinfo -a${m} -x |grep system_conf_t) ; done tmpfi...

This is a proposed patch to enhance FileSystem.h to add functionality (getting and setting permission bits and mapping an unmapping files). This implementation follows the N3365 proposal regarding permission bits. This functionality is needed for my next patch which will implement llvm/include/Support/FileOutputBuffer.h which is needed by lld. -------------- next part -------------- A

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > >> +  error_code ec = sys::fs::status(filePathTwine, stat); > > stat is undefined if ec isn't success. ec will be success even in the case of > file_not_found. Actually I was wrong. The Windows and UNIX implementation disagree on this point. I'm going to change it to match

...icy SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class sock_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy SELinux: permi...

...> allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : lnk_file { ioctl read write create getattr > setattr lock append unlink link rename } ; > allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : sock_file { ioctl read write create > getattr setattr lock append unlink link rename open } ; > allow ftpd_t samba_share_t : fifo_file { ioctl read write create > getattr setattr lock append unlink link rename open } ; > > May be the needed functionality is already there and all this discussion > is the equivalent of shooting a gun on sparrows. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS...

????????? ???????? ????? 2016-07-05 19:58: >> I need to have the tftpdir_rw_t and samba_share_t SELinux context >> on >> the same directory. >> >> How can we do this? Is it feasible to have more than one SELinux >> context? > > I don't think it's possible/feasible. > You'd probably need to add a new type and necessary rules to your

Ok, so there is not a problem with SElinux and Samba. But it is a pain to set up so it will work right. I finally figured out how to set up SE and Samba so you can be able to write and delete files. I found in one of that man pages "man samba_selinux", you can just disable SE for samba. I am sure there are other ways also but this is what I have found so far. I tried to just

...: Permission watch_sb in class sock_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689955] SELinux: Permission watch_with_perm in class sock_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689956] SELinux: Permission watch_reads in class sock_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689958] SELinux: Permission watch in class fifo_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689959] SELinux: Permission watch_mount in class fifo_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689961] SELinux: Permission watch_sb in class fifo_file not defined in policy. [ 9.689962] SELinux: Permission watch_with_perm in class fifo_file not defined in policy. [...

Hello, Can somebody of the Samba team explain me the difference of Fedora packages or Enterprise packages ( <http://enterprisesamba.com/> http://enterprisesamba.com/) of Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? I tried to find any information about this subject, but googleing doesn't help me. The standard Samba package (3.0.10EL) of RHEL4 doesn't communicate with a W2k3 server

Am 09.09.2018 um 14:49 schrieb Daniel Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>: > > On 09/08/2018 09:50 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Any SElinux expert here - briefly: >> >> # getenforce >> Enforcing >> >> # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file -p read |grep system_conf_t >> <no output> >> >> # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file

...*ref; unsigned char *ptr; long pos; long end; } oggbyte_buffer; typedef struct ogg_sync_state { /* decode memory management pool */ ogg_buffer_state *bufferpool; /* stream buffers */ ogg_reference *fifo_head; ogg_reference *fifo_tail; long fifo_fill; /* stream sync management */ int unsynced; int headerbytes; int bodybytes; } ogg_sync_state; typedef struct ogg_stream_state { ogg_reference *header_head; ogg_reference *header_tail; ogg_reference *body_head; ogg_reference *body_tail;...

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Also adding Cornelia. > > > On 06.02.20 23:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:12:21PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 06.02.20 15:22, eperezma at redhat.com wrote: > >>> Hi Christian. > >>> > >>>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Also adding Cornelia. > > > On 06.02.20 23:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:12:21PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 06.02.20 15:22, eperezma at redhat.com wrote: > >>> Hi Christian. > >>> > >>>