search for: fieldvalu

Dear R-help Group Scenario 1: I have a text file running to 1000 of lines...that is like as follows: [922] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubMonth" [923] "FieldValue: Apr" [924] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubYear" [925] "FieldValue: 2017" [926] "FieldName: Wk3Code1" [927] "FieldValue: " [928] "FieldValue: K4" [929] "FieldName: Wk3Code2" [930] "FieldValue: " [931] "FieldValu...

...Thu, 13 Jul 2017 at 13:13 Vijayan Padmanabhan <V.Padmanabhan at itc.in> wrote: > > Dear R-help Group > > > Scenario 1: > I have a text file running to 1000 of lines...that > is like as follows: > > [922] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubMonth" > > [923] "FieldValue: Apr" > > [924] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubYear" > > [925] "FieldValue: 2017" > > [926] "FieldName: Wk3Code1" > > [927] "FieldValue: " > > [928] "FieldValue: K4" > > [929] "FieldName: Wk3Code2" &g...

...Padmanabhan at itc.in> wrote: > > Dear R-help Group > > > Scenario 1: > I have a text file running to 1000 of lines...that > is like as follows: > > [922] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubMonth" > > [923] "FieldValue: Apr" > > [924] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubYear" > > [925] "FieldValue: 2017" > > [926] "FieldName: Wk3Code1" > > [927] "FieldValue: " > > [928] "FieldValue: K4" >...

...> > Dear R-help Group > > > > > > Scenario 1: > > I have a text file running to 1000 of lines...that > > is like as follows: > > > > [922] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubMonth" > > > > [923] "FieldValue: Apr" > > > > [924] "FieldName: Wk3PackSubYear" > > > > [925] "FieldValue: 2017" > > > > [926] "FieldName: Wk3Code1" > > > > [927] "FieldValue: " > > >...

...itecture dependent and I assume should therefore be invisible). Correct? If that argument is persuasive, then the following seems a bit more consistent with the existing syntax: ; Manipulation of a union register variable %myUnion = unioncast i32, %myValue to union {i32, float} %fieldValue = unioncast union {i32, float} %myUnion to i32 ; %fieldValue == %myValue This specialized union cast fits the pattern of having specialized cast operations between value and pointer as opposed to two values or two pointers. That's enough, as you could require that unions be loaded and...

I''m seeing this same problem that Josh was seeing back on March 23rd (see below) I''ve got the following YAML snippet stored in a text field: "--- !ruby/object:FieldValue \nattributes: \n item_id: 60\n title: Test\n field_id: 15\n created_by_id: 5\n locale: en\n link: www.cclearn.com\n comment: this is a test\n created_at: 2006-05-02 15:43:14.256792 Z\nnew_record: true\n" When deserialize this using YAML.load and the FieldValue class is not loaded I s...

...ould therefore be invisible). Correct? > > If that argument is persuasive, then the following seems a bit more > consistent with the existing syntax: > > ; Manipulation of a union register variable > %myUnion = unioncast i32, %myValue to union {i32, float} > %fieldValue = unioncast union {i32, float} %myUnion to i32 > ; %fieldValue == %myValue > > This specialized union cast fits the pattern of having specialized cast > operations between value and pointer as opposed to two values or two > pointers. > > That's enough, as you could r...

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org>wrote: > Talin schrieb: > > Well, the fact that union members have to be indexed by number means that >> the ordering has to be part of the type - so even though type-theoretically >> union { i32, float } is the same as union { float, i32 }, in my >> implementation they are distinct types.

Talin schrieb: > Well, the fact that union members have to be indexed by number means > that the ordering has to be part of the type - so even though > type-theoretically union { i32, float } is the same as union { float, > i32 }, in my implementation they are distinct types. However, from the > standpoint of a frontend, this is not a great concern, because the > frontend

...hash hasn''t been stored yet, because nobody pressed the "Create" button. So the next thought is to actually pass in the value when you press the link, along the lines of: <%= link_to("Lookup by title", :action => ''lookup_by_title'', :val => fieldValue) %> But how do I get the contents of the field? In JavaScript I''d do document.formName.fieldName.value, but I can''t do that here because 1. what is the name of this form? and 2. If I simply say document. blah blah blah, Ruby barfs because it doesn''t know what doc...

...ubmit()" in the form. My Code is <%= start_form_tag :action => ''update'', :id => @person.id, "onsubmit"=>"return isDateSet(document.forms[0].elements[''fieldname''].value)"; %> The JS-function returns false if length of fieldvalue < 1. So far everything works fine. But: the message does not appear, the Form is posted although it should not. I expect the Form not to be posted if the validation fails (false is returned). Whats the correct way to do this? Thank you Thorsten -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.c...

I''ve read the Rails Envy AAF tutorial at http://railsenvy.com/2007/2/19/acts-as-ferret-tutorial and its given me some really good ideas. My problem lies in having AAF search the target Model''s child tables. I have no problem at all doing something like: acts_as_ferret :fields => [:title, :update_collection, :member_name] def member_name return

...; <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate > anymore. > > root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# > <http://onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super#> doveadm user test at onnet.ch > <mailto:test at onnet.ch> > fieldvalue > uid5000 > gid5000 > home/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/ <http://onnet.ch/test/> > mailmaildir:~/Maildir > quota_rule*:bytes=1073741824 > aclvfile:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-acl > acl_globals_onlyyes > > root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user test2 at onn...

Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate anymore. root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# doveadm user test at onnet.ch field value uid 5000 gid 5000 home /var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/ mail maildir:~/Maildir quota_rule *:bytes=1073741824 acl