search for: fibinocci

...Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY the end of the day on Oct. 19th! Speaking of, we really need a test suite to test llvm itself, and not llvm-gcc (to make sure llvm is correct on platforms without a gcc build system). The closest we have is the Fibinocci project and that is anything but conclusive.

LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the

...t;tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> Please COMPLETE ALL TESTING BY the end of the day on Oct. 19th! > Speaking of, we really need a test suite to test llvm itself, and not > llvm-gcc (to make sure llvm is correct on platforms without a gcc > build system). The closest we have is the Fibinocci project and that > is anything but conclusive. I could add that to my CMake build system TODO, but so far I'm a bit skeptic about LLVM relevance on the non-Unix world. The Windows build can be broken for a long period before anyone notices. The VS2003 support is broken since a long time ago...