search for: fhahn

...chieve that goal, as many passes were not respectful of that contract, but as of 3667d87a33d3c8d4072a41fd84bb880c59347dc0, https://reviews.llvm .org/D80916 has been merged in master and the check is active, which should prevent further regression on that topic. Thanks a lot to @foad, @jdoerfert, @fhahn, @calixte (and others I'm sorry to forgot) for their help during the reviews. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:24 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:42 AM Serge Guelton via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >...

...ses were not > respectful of that contract, but as > of 3667d87a33d3c8d4072a41fd84bb880c59347dc0, https://reviews.llvm > .org/D80916 has been merged in master and the check is active, which > should prevent further regression on that topic. > > Thanks a lot to @foad, @jdoerfert, @fhahn, @calixte (and others I'm sorry > to forgot) for their help during the reviews. > > > This is great news! > > Some years ago, we did some experiments on whether we could develop more > fixed-point optimization within LLVM's pipeline. This was not the only > impedimen...

...gt; and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > -- Florian Hahne, PhD Computational Biology Program Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876 PO Box 19024 Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 206-667-3148 fhahne at fhcrc.org

Hi everybody, I am trying to write a simple progress display based on a tcltk toplevel. My first approach was to use the progressBar widget from the BWidget library but since this is not available on every system (missing on at least almost all windows systems, I guess...) I wanted to have a backup there. So my second strategy was to use a simple toplevel with a label and update the tclvariable

Hi folks, Per the documentation[0], whenever an LLVM pass doesn't modify the IR it's run on, it should return `false`--it's okay to return `true` if no change happen, just less optimal. In the New PM area, this is generally translated into a `PreservedAnalyses::all()`. https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916 provides an `EXPENSIVE_CHECK` that computes a hash of the IR before and after the