Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ffffffff816ad7f".
Did you mean:
ffffffff816ad7fe
2017 Oct 23
0
Crash in CentOS 7 kernel-3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 in Xen PV mode
...s ext4 mbcache jbd2
xen_blkfront xen_netfront crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common crc32c_intel
[ 13.372545] CPU: 0 PID: 1138 Comm: mysqld Not tainted
3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 #1
[ 13.372555] task: ffff8800fb1a8fd0 ti: ffff8801e9e20000 task.ti:
ffff8801e9e20000
[ 13.372561] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff816ad7fe>] [<ffffffff816ad7fe>]
enter_lazy.part.0+0x4/0x6
[ 13.372579] RSP: e02b:ffff8801fea03a80 EFLAGS: 00010002
[ 13.372584] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88017d05b280 RCX:
ffffffff810215a0
[ 13.372593] RDX: ffff880000000280 RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI:
0000000000000001
[ 13.372599] RBP: ffff880...
2017 May 21
2
Crash in CentOS 7 kernel-3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 in Xen PV mode
I experienced a bug that is likely the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit
b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it, doesn't appear in this kernel and doesn't apply cleanly either.
Is there any point in trying to backport the patch?
The backtrace is as follows:
[ 32.304666] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[