search for: ffastmath

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "ffastmath".

Did you mean: fastmath
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...11.2016 09:51, Ristow, Warren wrote: > Those are all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of > inlining is particularly interesting. > > > > FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' > to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a while > to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is right) > more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" > due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal > situation, here, other...
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...2016 09:51, Ristow, Warren wrote: > Those are all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of > inlining is particularly interesting. > > > > FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' > to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a while > to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is right) > more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" > due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal > situation, here, other...
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...are all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of >>> inlining is particularly interesting. >>> >>> >>> >>> FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' >>> to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a while >>> to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is right) >>> more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" >>> due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal >...
2016 Nov 17
4
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when
2016 Nov 17
3
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...ing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags Those are all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of inlining is particularly interesting. FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a while to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is right) more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal situation, here, other than to turn off fas...
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...all fast-math-flags > > > > Those are all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of > inlining is particularly interesting. > > > > FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' > to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a > while to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is > right) more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" > due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal > situation, here, oth...
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
...all good points. Your reassociation point in the context of >>> inlining is particularly interesting. >>> >>> >>> >>> FWIW, we also have a case where a customer wants '-fno-associative-math' >>> to suppress reassociation under '-ffastmath'. It would take me a >>> while to find the specifics of the issue, but it was (if my memory is >>> right) more of a real use-case. (That is to say, the code that was "failing" >>> due to reassociation didn't have an obvious fix like the reciprocal &...