search for: ff807362

...ice example about dns islanding. http://retrohack.com/a-word-or-two-about-dns-islanding/ and with only 2 dc's setup the resolv.confs like : DC01 Primary DNS 10.1.1.2 Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 DC02 Primary DNS 10.1.1.1 Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362%28v=ws.10%29.aspx says: If the loopback IP address is the first entry in the list of DNS servers, Active Directory might be unable to find its replication partners. but this is manly MS DNS based, since there was a bug in the MS DNS server, concerning islanding.. Louis >-----Oorspronkelij...

...a-word-or-two-about-dns-islanding/ > > >and with only 2 dc's >setup the resolv.confs like : > >DC01 >Primary DNS 10.1.1.2 >Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 > >DC02 >Primary DNS 10.1.1.1 >Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 > >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362%28v=ws.10%29.aspx >says: >If the loopback IP address is the first entry in the list of DNS >servers, > Active Directory might be unable to find its replication partners. >but this is manly MS DNS based, since there was a bug in the MS DNS >server, concerning islanding.. > &g...

...7.how-to-disable-ipv6-through-group-policy.aspx   Or use : https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/929852   Last to know, above avoids DNS islanding in all cases.   Tell us your thoughts....   Greetz,   Louis   p.s.   source reverals : https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362(v=ws.10).aspx https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/275278 http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5927.how-to-disable-ipv6-through-group-policy.aspx  

...;http://10.1.1.2> Secondary DNS >> 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> DC02 Primary DNS 10.1.1.1 >> <http://10.1.1.1> Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 >> <http://127.0.0.1> >> >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362%28v=ws.10%29.aspx >> says: If the loopback IP address is the first entry in >the >> list of DNS servers, Active Directory might be unable to >> find its replication partners. but this is manly MS DNS >> based, since there wa...

...; Last to know, above avoids DNS islanding in all cases. > >   > > Tell us your thoughts.... > >   > > Greetz, > >   > > Louis > >   > > p.s. > >   > > source reverals : > > https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362(v=ws.10).aspx > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/275278 > > http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5927.how-to-disable-ipv6-through-group-policy.aspx > >   > Not sure I agree with you Louis, The first of the last links you posted seems to be...

On 11/03/15 18:01, James wrote: > Bob, > > Take a look at the following two links. > > http://retrohack.com/a-word-or-two-about-dns-islanding/ > > http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2010/07/17/friday-mail-sack-saturday-edition.aspx#dnsbest > > I have more than two DC's but generally I would have each one point at > the other. > > I tried that,

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:02:38 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > OK, this has nothing to do with the classicupgrade, I have setup a > couple of VMs and provisioned a test DC in one and joined another DC > in the other. > > I am now at the point the OP is at, samba_dnsupdate cannot add the > required records, all I get in log.samba is