Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ff32b382".
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...the
> multi-pass would, so we would get similar results, but it doesn't seem to
> be the case with clang.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/ff32b382/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: livermore-llvm-bug.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 5933 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/ff32b382/attachment.zip>
2013 Jan 03
5
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
David,
I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue
is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step
compilation.
When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of
each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.