Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ff22942c".
2013 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
...how, otherwise a lot of other stuff won't work.
I don't see why load and store are special at this level though. Or
insert/extract element?
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130425/ff22942c/attachment.html>
2013 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
Hi Dan,
Others have weighed in on the merits of IR vs MI legalization, I thought I'd chip in on a different area:
+ /// Legal roughly means there's a physical register class on the target
+ /// machine for a type, and there's a reasonable set of instructions
+ /// which operate on registers of this class and interpret their contents
+ /// as instances of the type. For
2013 Apr 25
11
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the
SelectionDAG framework, it is desirable to implement legalization passes as
discrete passes. Attached is a patch which implements the beginning of a
new type legalization pass, to help motivate discussion.
Is LLVM IR the right level for this? The main alternative approach that's
been discussed is to do FastISel to a