search for: ff22942c

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ff22942c".

2013 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
...how, otherwise a lot of other stuff won't work. I don't see why load and store are special at this level though. Or insert/extract element? Dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130425/ff22942c/attachment.html>
2013 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
Hi Dan, Others have weighed in on the merits of IR vs MI legalization, I thought I'd chip in on a different area: + /// Legal roughly means there's a physical register class on the target + /// machine for a type, and there's a reasonable set of instructions + /// which operate on registers of this class and interpret their contents + /// as instances of the type. For
2013 Apr 25
11
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the SelectionDAG framework, it is desirable to implement legalization passes as discrete passes. Attached is a patch which implements the beginning of a new type legalization pass, to help motivate discussion. Is LLVM IR the right level for this? The main alternative approach that's been discussed is to do FastISel to a