Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ff17".
Did you mean:
fc17
2015 Mar 26
2
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
...have some hardware, on an internal network - that only
supports 40-bit ssl. I am forced to continue to use FF v17 because that was
the last browser to provide SSL40-bit support. My security is weakened
because I cannot update that browser, and I continue to lose plugins
because they do not support FF17 anymore. All other browsers stopped
support earlier as well.
So, complete removal, with no alternative means I cannot update to newer -
safer - technology. But security is three pronged:
Confidential, Integrity, and Availability. Removal of something such that
there is no alternative is equal to a...
2015 Mar 27
3
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
...ork - that only
> > supports 40-bit ssl. I am forced to continue to use FF v17 because that was
> > the last browser to provide SSL40-bit support. My security is weakened
> > because I cannot update that browser, and I continue to lose plugins
> > because they do not support FF17 anymore. All other browsers stopped
> > support earlier as well.
>
> Please put the device behind a stunnel and don't put yourself at risk.
I don't think Michael is accessing that device over the Internet - but even
*in house* some devices force you to jump through such hoops....
2015 Apr 01
2
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
...o continue to use FF v17 because
> that
> > > > was
> > > > the last browser to provide SSL40-bit support. My security is
> weakened
> > > > because I cannot update that browser, and I continue to lose plugins
> > > > because they do not support FF17 anymore. All other browsers stopped
> > > > support earlier as well.
> > >
> > > Please put the device behind a stunnel and don't put yourself at risk.
> >
> > I don't think Michael is accessing that device over the Internet - but
> even
> >...
2015 Mar 25
3
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 18:48 +1100, Damien Miller wrote:
> Our ability to influence people who run truly obsolete software is
> extremely limited.
+1, mostly because those who still use something that outdated in their
products are either dead, or simply don't care about their customer's
security (which is typical in the embedded devices area).
Just by us (or anyone else) saying
2016 Nov 21
2
Winbind traffic not encrypted
...3 4b26 3074 ba6a 2e9b 93ef .i...SK&0t.j....
0x0500: e93a 84c0 0c9c 7aba bd2b 248a 96fc a765 .:....z..+$....e
0x0510: e2cb d7fa 8db7 ffb9 e69d 96fd 657d 0a4c ............e}.L
0x0520: 91d2 c872 71cb 9a6e 25f5 07dd dd4a bcb3 ...rq..n%....J..
0x0530: a953 b6b0 5d49 63f8 623d ff17 b977 95f7 .S..]Ic.b=...w..
0x0540: 1c51 3860 584c 9519 8d32 b9bb f6f0 666f .Q8`XL...2....fo
0x0550: f921 e2d7 ea6a d549 5ff0 f6b8 534b b04f .!...j.I_...SK.O
0x0560: 21b9 80e3 b268 d903 7b36 235a 9fc8 a369 !....h..{6#Z...i
0x0570: 7547 bb89 d0b6 89a6 37dc 65bd a184 9f2e uG......