search for: fext

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Barbara Cegielska <barceg at ibch.poznan.pl> Subject: loading SPOT file Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:48:35 +0200 Size: 1151 URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20090506/e35e3f7e/attachment-0002.eml>

...not be used with" + " write-batch or read-batch\n"); + return 0; + } + *argv = poptGetArgs(pc); if (*argv) *argc = count_args(*argv); @@ -561,8 +581,8 @@ static char mdelete[30]; static char mwindow[30]; static char bw[50]; - static char fext[20]; - static char wbatch[14]; + /* Leave room for ``--(write|read)-batch='' */ + static char fext[MAXPATHLEN + 15]; int i, x; @@ -644,13 +664,14 @@ args[ac++] = mdelete; } - if (write_batch) { - snprintf(wbatch,sizeof(wbatch),"--write-batch"); - args[ac++] = w...

> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.

> On Oct 25, 2014, at 4:30 AM, Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com> wrote: > >> The same problem exists with any potentially trapping instruction (e.g. all floating point computations). The need for intrinsics goes way beyond loads and stores. > > We definitely looking at them, but decided to start from load and store. All FP + gather/scatter are in our

...quot;, 'B', POPT_ARG_INT, &block_size , 0, 0, 0 }, @@ -658,6 +661,7 @@ static char mdelete[30]; static char mwindow[30]; static char bw[50]; + static char rlevel[50]; /* Leave room for ``--(write|read)-batch='' */ static char fext[MAXPATHLEN + 15]; @@ -741,6 +745,12 @@ argstr[x] = 0; if (x != 1) args[ac++] = argstr; + + if (recurse_level) { + snprintf(rlevel,sizeof(rlevel),"-N%d",recurse_level); + args[ac++] = rlevel; + } + if (block_size != BLOCK_S...