search for: fewer

...es Using predict() i got a vector of 950 predicted values instead of 1554. The predictions are good though The model doesnt take account of negative values and NAs which are only 121 values. Any clue? Thank -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Why-predicted-values-are-fewer-that-the-real-tp4438912p4438912.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, There wasn't much information regarding fragment support of ext2/3 since 2003 [1], Andreas stating that there were problems with the xattr implementation. Has this changed in the meanwhile? My second question is regarding the bytes-per-inode ratio: What benefits would I gain from having fewer inodes? I reckon it's only diskspace (if so, how much?). best regards, Michael Renner [1] http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20030428_214.html#8

...a decision tree to class a set of only 8 objects and tried to use the rpart and tree function, but get a error message both times: rpart: fit is not a tree, just a root tree: cannot plot singlenode tree I read in the post 'question regression trees' that rpart doesn't split a set of fewer than 20 objects...so I guess the same holds true for the tree function? My questions therefore are: How can I change the function arguments in either the rpart or the tree function so they work for a set of less than 20 objects? I looked at the function body, but since I'm new to R, I couldn&...

It seems that fewer and fewer favorite programs run with wine. Stuff that ran 100% on older builds crashes out on the newer ones with elan. There needs to be (more) regression testing. However, damage has already been done and propagated and needs correction simply to get back to the previous level of operability.

Intercept guest reads of MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP and limit the number of memory banks reported to one. This prevents us from trying to read status of non-existent banks when migrated to a machine with fewer banks. Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro Signed-off-by: David Lively <dlively@virtualiron.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I just start to use R today! I am reading the R Help on read.csv and the description for header says "header is set to TRUE if and only if the first row contains one fewer field than the number of columns". Why is that? My data has the same number of fields in the first row as the number of columns. I mean I have no problem opening my csv file I am just curious why it should be one fewer. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/H...

...of the file: > wl <-read.table("sr003lines.tab", header=T, sep="\t") Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, : line 3 did not have 94 elements On receiving this error, I wrote a python script to go through the file to find rows with fewer than the 94 columns -- python finds that the first row with fewer than 94 columns is 1,706 -- much later than what R reports. R keeps running into this problem even with my python-massaged input file that I know for sure contains only rows with 94 columns. I also copied the first 4 rows of the in...

...09 at 3:01 PM, Bill Wendling<isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> The core problem, in my opinion, is that people *don't* pay attention >> to the build bot failure messages that come along. > > That's largely because of the number of false positives. > There have been fewer and fewer of these in recent times. -bw

Hi all, Which is the practical (from your experience) limit of the number of X100P cards installed in a single Asterisk box? Asterisk can work reliable with 6 X100P cards in the same box? Anyone know when the 4 ports FXO Digium card will be available on the market? Many thanks, Dan P.S. Please do not aswer with RTFG ...tried before without success...:-))

Behind every great release is a maintenance release. Go get it while it''s hot. We''ve also reworked the website a little - trying to scare off fewer people. Aslak

well this one got crickets. after a week, it appears there was no call for alarm. Please notify me how I mis-read the release notes. I just don't remember anything about reducing number of database objects. At any rate I am posting this as a note to anyone else who finds the same thing. On Friday, 17 April 2020, 16:42:39 GMT-7, ray klassen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

Hello! I have larger and a smaller data frame with 1 factor in each - it's the same factor: large.frame<-data.frame(myfactor=LETTERS[1:10]) small.frame<-data.frame(myfactor=LETTERS[c(9,7,5,3,1)]) levels(large.frame$myfactor) levels(small.frame$myfactor) table(large.frame$myfactor) table(small.frame$myfactor) myfactor has 10 levels in large.frame and 5 levels in small.frame. All 5

Hi there Is there an easy function available in R for calculating the running mean? Reto -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at

...ning.R,v 1.2 2001/09/01 00:01:54 warneg Exp $ # # $Log: running.R,v $ # Revision 1.2 2001/09/01 00:01:54 warneg # Release 0.3.0 # # Revision 1.1 2001/08/25 05:53:37 warneg # Initial CVS checkin. # # "running" _ function( X, fun=mean, width=min(length(X),20), allow.fewer=FALSE,...) { n _ length(X) from <- sapply( (1:n) - width + 1, function(x) max(x,1) ) to <- 1:n elements <- apply(cbind(from,to), 1,function(x) seq(x[1], x[2]) ) if(is.matrix(elements)) elements <- as.data.frame(elements) funct _ function(which,what,fun,...)...

Recently upgraded my 3 dc's to samba 4.12.1 as part of the install ran dbcheck --cross-ncs on each dc after make install first dc dbcheck reported 5474 objectssecond dc reported 5476 objects last dc (the one with all the fsmo roles, etc.)? reported 1406 objects! now all of them report 1406 objects. (drs replication obviously) ADUC, DNS, GPO manager all seem to have the requisite data. I

We have now resolved some TODO entries, making nbdinfo --list able to use a single connection except when doing content probing. --- info/nbdinfo.pod | 2 ++ TODO | 13 ----------- info/nbdinfo.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/info/nbdinfo.pod b/info/nbdinfo.pod index d0d20a9..19305bf 100644

Hello, I've got a problem using the function "running" in package gregmisc For example: test<-c(1,2,3,4,5) running(test,fun=var,width=3) gives 1:1 1:2 1:3 2:4 3:5 NA NA 2 3 4 which is wrong because var(test[1:3]) [1] 1 Where am I wrong? Thanks Xavier -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

I am using the R 2.2.1 in a Windows XP environment. I have a dataframe with 12 columns and 1,000 rows. (Some of the rows have 1 or fewer values.) I am trying to use rowVars to calculate the variance of each row. I am getting the following message: ?Error in na.remove.default(x) : length of 'dimnames' [1] not equal to array extent? Is there a good work-around?

Dear all, does anyone know a command to shut 'lme' (nlme) up? :) I have a loop for(i in 1:M){ lme(..) } and for each "i" i get the warning message >Fewer observations than random effects in all level 1 groups >in: ... I know I'm using "fewer observations...", I just don't want to see the message printed on the screen during the loop. Thanks, Marco Geraci > sessionInfo() R version 2.2.1, 2005-12-20, i386-pc-mingw32 attac...

Hi all, I've been struggling with trying to specify a diagnoal matrix for linear mixed effects model. I think I've got nearly everything correct, except the following message appears: In lme.formula(fixed = fwave ~ sex + sexXbulbar + visit + age + : Fewer observations than random effects in all level 1 groups Not sure if i've provided enough details, but I'm basically trying to perform a mixed effects model analysis, controlling for several covariates. Incorporating random effects for the intercept and slope. What does the second line, ...