Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "fetishists".
2004 Feb 08
2
strange behaviour with -C
Hi!
This problem gave me quite a headache tonight...
I more or less have this source directory:
hop@krautesel:/var/tmp$ ls -laR from/
from/:
total 12
drwxrwxr-x 3 hop hop 4096 Feb 8 03:34 .
drwxrwxrwt 6 root root 4096 Feb 8 03:34 ..
drwxrwxr-x 2 hop hop 4096 Feb 8 03:18 CVS
-rw-rw-r-- 1 hop hop 0 Feb 8
2019 Nov 11
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
...arguing that
"<someclass>" %in% class(.)
> uses usual syntax, and thus looks less intimidating than
> inherit() and less cryptic than is()
I think you should all use -- and *teach* --
inherits(.) more often, and it would no longer be intimidating.
Also, for the speed fetishists: inherits() will typically be
slightly (but significantly) faster than ` %in% class(.) `
Martin
2019 Nov 12
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
...est (looks cute).
But trying to make the case for "<someclass>" %in% class(x) on
Twitter??! %-/
</ranting mode>
H.
>
> I think you should all use -- and *teach* --
> inherits(.) more often, and it would no longer be intimidating.
>
> Also, for the speed fetishists: inherits() will typically be
> slightly (but significantly) faster than ` %in% class(.) `
>
> Martin
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listi...
2019 Nov 10
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
>
>> I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
>> nice improvement in behavior. While Herve's point is valid
>> and I understand his frustration,
1999 Mar 26
3
*ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild.
-=> To moderator:
I don't know whether it's wise to release the FTP-location
I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run
something like nessus against theirselves...
Greetings,
Jan-Philip Velders
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700
From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET>
To:
2006 Jul 23
7
"throwing out the old": does Rails really not support...
Frankly I''m losing tolerance for the MS "stack." And I''m intrigued by
Rails. But in my outfit I''m not only the web person, but also the
application person and the DBA. So when I read that Rails doesn''t want
to handle things like "compound keys" I blew right by those claims,
thinking, "no way."
But before I go deeper, I
2006 Jul 26
15
Pupppet Ruby DSL
I constantly get told I should just create a DSL in Ruby, instead of
having a separate, custom language. This has, unsurprisingly, come
up multiple times here at OSCON.
So, I decided I''d see if I could hack something up and see how it
looked. This is the first thing I could come up with in terms of the
basic functionality:
#!/usr/bin/ruby
class Base
file "/etc/passwd",