search for: fernandolmg

...ail&utm_content=webmail> Livre de v?rus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Em seg., 22 de jun. de 2020 ?s 11:55, Fernando Gon?alves < fernandolmg at gmail.com> escreveu: > Ok Rowland. > Muito obrigado por mais essa ajuda. > At? a pr?xima. > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Livre > de v?rus. www.avast.com > <https:...

...ail&utm_content=webmail> Livre de v?rus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Em seg., 22 de jun. de 2020 ?s 11:57, Fernando Gon?alves < fernandolmg at gmail.com> escreveu: > Oops, wrong language ;D > > Okay Rowland. > Thank you very much for this help. > To the next. > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Livre > de v?r...

...mail&utm_content=webmail> Livre de v?rus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Em ter., 2 de jun. de 2020 ?s 12:34, Fernando Gon?alves < fernandolmg at gmail.com> escreveu: > I apologize for forgetting to pass on all the information. > In fact, this problem is occurring because of the migration from a VM with > Oracle SunOS to another VM with Oracle Linux 7. > This old VM is for production and runs the CACH? database, so we deci...

...ail&utm_content=webmail> Livre de v?rus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Em qui., 18 de jun. de 2020 ?s 13:55, Fernando Gon?alves < fernandolmg at gmail.com> escreveu: > Hello everyone. > I'm back because I decided to follow your advice and deploy the system > using a new version of SAMBA with encrypted passwords. > I added the SAMBA server in the AD domain without any problems and I am > already accessing the shares...

On 22/06/2020 14:00, Fernando Gon?alves wrote: > Good morning Rowland. > > As you may have noticed, I am no expert in deploying SAMBA in an AD > domain. > Could you give me a link with a tutorial that explains in a simple way > the procedure for this? You could start here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member > > Just to not leave

I apologize for forgetting to pass on all the information. In fact, this problem is occurring because of the migration from a VM with Oracle SunOS to another VM with Oracle Linux 7. This old VM is for production and runs the CACH? database, so we decided to create a new VM and migrate everything to it. We have already migrated the database and users without problems. Only on each machine of these

Hello everyone. I'm back because I decided to follow your advice and deploy the system using a new version of SAMBA with encrypted passwords. I added the SAMBA server in the AD domain without any problems and I am already accessing the shares with AD users. However I have a new problem for which I need help. When I try to access SAMBA shares with local Linux users, it is necessary to include

Ok Rowland. Muito obrigado por mais essa ajuda. At? a pr?xima. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Livre de v?rus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Em

I tried to use only one username in the "valid users" parameter but it didn't work. SMB.CONF [folder] ... valid users = userX net use \\ samba-server \ folder userX_password There seems to be no solution for my case. :( Em ter., 20 de out. de 2020 ?s 11:50, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > On 20/10/2020 15:36, Fernando Gon?alves wrote:

Samba is running as a member of an AD domain. Yes, windows users belong to an AD domain. However, in addition to these AD users, the samba server also uses local Linux users. Em ter., 20 de out. de 2020 ?s 13:01, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > On 20/10/2020 16:56, Fernando Gon?alves wrote: > > I tried to use only one username in the "valid

Good afternoon. I really need some help. I have a VM running Oracle Linux version 7 and samba version 4.10.4. I want samba to use local Linux users and passwords (/ etc / passwd and / etc / shadow). As I researched on the internet it would be enough to configure samba to not encrypt passwords, through the item: encrypt passwords = no However it is not working. can anybody help me? Thanks in

Hello people! I have a question and I urgently need help. I migrated from SAMBA version 3 to version 4. However, in version 3 there was the parameter "username" in the sharing options, which allowed scripts to exist where it was not necessary to pass the user's name only his password to map a folder. In version 4, this parameter is ignored. My question is: in version 4 is there

Good morning Rowland. As you may have noticed, I am no expert in deploying SAMBA in an AD domain. Could you give me a link with a tutorial that explains in a simple way the procedure for this? Just to not leave without a return I executed the following commands: # getent group TJSC\users # Nothing came back. # getent group TJSC users users: x: 100: This group "users" is local to the

I will pass all the commands I used for installation and inclusion of the linux server server in AD. Installation of KERBEROS 5 packages: #yum install krb5-server krb5-libs krb5-workstation I added the following lines to the /etc/krb5.conf file [libdefaults] default_realm = SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = false I installed realmd # yum install realmd I ran the

I'm sorry, but since I'm a SAMBA / Linux developer, I don't know how to answer your questions. What I can say is that before SAMBA (stand alone) was used in version 3.6.6, where the "username" option was used in the sharing settings. For example: SMB.CONF [folder] path = ... username = userX Thus, the following line was passed in a DOS script: net use x:

The "valid users" parameter already existed in version 3 of the SAMBA and indicated which users were allowed to access the share. The "username" parameter indicated which user should be used when it was not defined at the time of mapping. SMB.CONF [folder] ... username = userX valid users = userX, userY, ... To map the "folder" share, only the following line was

This is very problematic for me! In this LINUX VM I have registered more than 40 users for over 10 years. I wouldn't even bother having to register everyone on SAMBA, the question is the passwords of these users. Em seg., 1 de jun. de 2020 ?s 20:09, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> escreveu: > On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 19:02 -0300, Fernando Gon?alves via samba wrote: > >