Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "femaleset".
Did you mean:
females
2011 May 19
1
lmer with 2 random effects with only two levels
...1.9 B low
5 2.0 A low
6 2.1 B low
The order of treatment is counterbalanced and I would assume I would choose
to fit the model:
> model1<-lme(response~treat, random=~1|femaleset/group)
or
> model2<-lmer(response~treat+(1|femaleset/group))
However I am concerned with two aspcts: my small sample size of course but
also the use of a random effect of female set only has two levels (A and B).
Is there a more appropriate way to handle this analysis? A glm with female...