search for: felts

Dear WizaRds, I would like to fit a curve to ten points with nls() for one unknown parameter gamma in the Kahnemann/ Tversky function, but somehow it won't work and I am unable to locate my mistake. p.kum <- seq(0.1,1, by=0.1) felt.prob.kum <- c(0.16, 0.23, 0.36, 0.49, 0.61, 0.71, 0.85, 0.89, 0.95, 1) ## how to find a function that fits these points nicely? plot(p.kum,

Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >> written in pure shell script, so no python dependencies. >> https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh > > Thanks - I might look at that, but as Ralph mentions in his reply - > Let's encrypt certs are only for three months - never ending circus.

I know, this probably isn't the right place for it, but, I was just finding the nth use for syslinux and thinking yet again just how handy these tools are and just felt like saying it. Thanks for all your hard work Mr. Anvin in providing not just a massively useful tool that's open to all to use for free, but, even supporting this tool so well.

Dear Mongrel Users, It appears that Francis still isn''t satisfied with my attempts to apologize and he''s now asked me privately to retract my statements. So, just to be sure he finally gets it: I retract my statements that Francis and his friends are "shady" and "desperate for cash". He is in no way a shady guy, having dealt with this situation with the

On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt: >> On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Does your build end at some particular point? >> See **** DETAILS **** for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report. >>> >>> Aki >> >> I would guess this is not "c99" way... > > It seems to

a) google: "dovecot imap configuration" brought an article from 2005 as the first item: while I like debian and a bit of history you may want to ask yourself how to improve your site as the primary hit from google. FYI: years ago I had great results in the top of google searches - and then I made a major error - I moved my site to a new url and google forgot me. b) using your

I am assuming this is a user error (and the bug, if any is in configure not telling me how to activate it). I regularly see a message: Could not load host key: /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key And, obviously, I have never made the key before. I tried the following: ./ssh-keygen -t ecdsa -fssh_host_esdsa_key -N "" unknown key type ecdsa However, the syntax says it is a known type root at

Hi, I am working with a dataset for sometime and I need some help in parsing some data. There is a column called "Duration" which has data like following: 2 minutes => 120 2 min => 120 10 seconds =>10 2 hrs =>7200 2-3 minutes => 150 or 120 5 minutes (when i arrived => 300 Flyby approx 20 sec. => 20 felt like 10 mins but tim => 600 I need to convert them to

On 13/10/2017 15:29, Michael Felt wrote: > This verifies it is xauth related: > > debug3: sending debug message: No xauth program; cannot forward with > spoofing. > > so, added an extra debug - and this is what I see: > > debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 req x11-req > debug3: setup_x11fwd: xauth_location == /usr/X11R6/bin/xauth > debug3: sending debug

> Rmetrics - New Version is available for R 1.9 !! > in R-binary and R-source form from the site "http://www.rmetrics.org", > and install the binary "zip" files in the usual way via the menu I'm confused - does the fact that you are only distributing ".zip" files means that (shudder) I need Microsoft Windows in order to run this? (I hunted on the

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > Hmm, it felt nicer to mark raw LLVM pointers as roots and then transform > > them, since I then didn't have to see the overhead in my frontend :). > > I'm not sure what overhead you mean. I think I should have emphasized "felt", since it only would make me produce

Renato, Renato Golin wrote: > On 15 October 2015 at 09:35, Bill Kelly via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: >>> However, it is incredibly >>> important to not expect or demand that a person *you have made feel >>> unsafe* take the time to explain why. >> >> I feel what you have written

Hi, Thank you David. My question was from a machine independent code analyzer/optimizer perspective where types are of less importance. Hence I felt difficult to understand the IR with the types. Rekha On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 27 Oct 2014, at 12:46, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > > Why

On 23 April 2018 at 19:49, Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> wrote: [...] > run test agent.sh ... [...] > Question: I have not dug into the tests yet. Will copy to a "local" > directory, and not build out of tree and see if that fixes it (as it does > for many other packages). However, just in case it does not - how can I > fast-forward the tests to the

wwp wrote: >>> >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be >>> released during the next cycle. >>> >>> >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: >> >> This update upgrades Firefox to version

Hi, I am curious to know the design decision on why operands of LLVM IR instructions are type annotated. Why wasn't the C style of explicit declaration of variables (or values in LLVM context) followed by their uses model not adopted here? or may be even annotate the value (result of the Instruction) with type rather than annotating each operands on the Instruction? Just felt that by

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > However, it is incredibly > important to not expect or demand that a person *you have made feel > unsafe* take the time to explain why. I feel what you have written here to be offensive to the highest degree, and your words make me feel unsafe when contemplating their effect on my prospects for future interaction with this community.

Hi everyone, I have felt for quite some time that during my regular LLVM workflow, CMake recompiles a lot of files after I update to the latest ToT (which I do more than once per week). Of course, this wasn't really based on any real data, just felt like every time I update (even if it's a day or two later), we end up recompiling everything. For a while I assumed that patches touch a few

Hi, all! Anyone know an easy way to specify the following model. Panel dataset, with stock through time, by firm. I want to run a model of y on a bunch of explanatory variables, and one dummy for each firm, which is 1 for observations that come from firm i, and 0 everywhere else. I have over 200 firms (and a factor variable that contains a firm identifier). Any easy way of going about