search for: feldt

...loop when running it on an example. I want to send a "--verbose" to heckle but can''t find a way to do that through the spec binary. Since this is not an uncommon situation when using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec. Thoughts? Best regards, /Robert Feldt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070712/d92af696/attachment.html

...(numbering conditions, 2 levels). - one within-cell factor: facWithin (which numbers subjects, while subjects are considered repetitions of the same measurement). This is basically the repeatedness of the data. For this data, I do anovas for several linear models. SAS also calculates the Huynh-Feldt-Test, which is in this case very important to the users and cannot be replaced with nlme or something of the kind (as recommended in http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/03b/0813.html. The models I use for the anovas are the following: aov(vecData ~ (facWithin + facBetweenROI + facBetwee...

Hi, I'm getting to grips with using R to perform repeat measures analysis of variance and was wondering is there a potted method to obtain Huynh and Feldt or other adjustments for sphericity violations? Thanks Dominic Dr Dominic J Barraclough Dept Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Av, Box 603, Rochester NY 14642 tel (716) 2753627 dominic_barraclough at urmc.rochester.edu -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...

I'm an experimental psychologist and when I run ANOVA analysis in SPSS, I normally ask for a test of non-sphericity (Box's M-test). I also ask for output of the corrections for non-sphericity, such as Greenhouse-Geisser and Huhn-Feldt. These tests and correction factors are commonly used in the journals for experimental and other psychology reports. I have been switching from SPSS to R for over a year now, but I realize now that I don't have the non-sphericity test and correction factors. The backgroud to this question is...

Hi, I'm using anova.mlm sphericity tests/corrections, and I'm getting different values than SAS. In order to be able to use these values for publications, I'd need to know more about the SAS bug that is mentioned in the Reference Manual. - What exactly causes the different values? - Is it just a slight difference, or can I expect significant differences in H-F/G-G epsilons and

...[gcc.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/pd/llvm/cfrontend/build/gcc' make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 when building the cfrontend. Any ideas? This is on a Windows XP Pro SP1 machine running a recently updated cygwin with $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (cygwin special) Regards, Robert Feldt -- Robert Feldt robert.feldt at htu.se tel: +46-520-475072, mob:+46-733-580580 Ass Prof, Phd, Senior Lecturer of SW Engineering Dept. of Informatics and Mathematics, HTU P.O. Box 957, SE-461 29 Trollhättan, SWEDEN

...mpute corrected df for the F-test if the assumption is violated. Back when I taught this course using SPSS it was relatively straightforward - we would look at Mauchly's test of sphericity - if it was significant, then we would use one of the corrected F-tests (e.g. Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt) that were spat out automagically by SPSS. I gather from searching the r-help archives, searching google, and searching through various books on R, that the only way of using mauchly.test() in R is on a multivariate model object (e.g. mauchly.test cannot handle an aov() object). Question 1: how d...

...module Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: feldt at nhn.ou.edu In upgrading from OpenSSH-4.3p2 to -4.6p1 we find that the pam_abl module no longer functions properly. It always has the error status (passed to the cleanup function) set to 0 when pam_end is called now - even if authentication failed. This functioned properly in 4.3p2. This is...

...Adj Pr > F > Source G - G H - F > > roi <.0001 <.0001 > Error(roi) > > > Greenhouse-Geisser Epsilon 0.5367 > Huynh-Feldt Epsilon 0.6333 > > > Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F > > ord 1 2.2104107 2.2104107 0.24 0.6276 > Error(ord) 19 172.7047994 9.0897263 > > > Source...

Chris Lattner wrote: >On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote: > > > >>However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for >>cygwin? >> >> > >Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry. > > > >>I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get >>when buil...

Hey all, I see examples showing up that look like this: describe Thing do before(:each) do @thing = Thing.new end it do @thing.should be_something end end This will produce output like this: Thing - should be something But "it do" is driving me mad :( We need a better word. Of course, ''specify'' has not been completely removed, so you can still do

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote: > However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the > CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the > runtime: [snip] > Compiling crtend.c to bytecode > Files/ATI: not found [snip] > I don't understand the error message since I see no...

I''ve tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec? Scott

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 --- Comment #6 from Tom Cox <tomc at hot.rr.com> 2007-06-24 03:12:38 --- Created an attachment (id=1312) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1312) Change prevents pam_end from being called with current status. File shows problem introduced in session.c, version 1.346. -- Configure bugmail:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote: > However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for > cygwin? Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry. > I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get > when building the cfrontend. Any ideas? That is really wierd. Looking at that lin...

...r with an additional fourth between subjects factor D. Everything works fine using aov(val ~ A*B*C + Error(subject/ (A*B*C) ) ) or aov(val ~ (D*A*B*C) + Error(subject/(A*B*C)) + D ) val, A, B, C, D and subject are columns in a data.frame. How can I get the estimated Greenhouse-Geisser and Huynh-Feldt epsilons? I know Peter Dalgaard described it in R-News Vol. 7/2, October 2007. However, unfortunately I am not able to apply that using my data... Furthermore, I am still confused of how SPSS calculates the epsilons since it is mentioned that perhaps there are any errors in SPSS?? I would be gl...

Misha Brukman wrote: >On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote: > > >>However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the >>CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the >>runtime: >> >> >[snip] > > >>Compiling crtend.c to bytecode >>Files/ATI: not found &gt...

...UP) > mlmfit1 <- lm(data.n ~ 1 + SGROUP) > anova(mlmfit1,mlmfit0,test="Spherical",M=~hemi,X=~1) Analysis of Variance Table Model 1: data.n ~ 1 + SGROUP Model 2: data.n ~ 0 + SGROUP Contrasts orthogonal to ~1 Contrasts spanned by ~hemi Greenhouse-Geisser epsilon: 0.6829 Huynh-Feldt epsilon: 0.7127 Res.Df Df Gen.var. F num Df den Df Pr(>F) G-G Pr H-F Pr 1 22 0.54295 2 22 0 0.54295 Inf 0 44 Warning messages: 1: NaNs produced in: pf(q, df1, df2, lower.tail, log.p) 2: NaNs produced in: pf(q, df1, df2, lower.tail, log.p) 3: NaNs produced in: p...

...6667 12 11.438 0.001660 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Mauchly Tests for Sphericity Test statistic p-value fB 0.87891 0.7242 fattA:fB 0.87891 0.7242 Greenhouse-Geisser and Huynh-Feldt Corrections for Departure from Sphericity GG eps Pr(>F[GG]) fB 0.89199 0.0001474 *** fattA:fB 0.89199 0.0026452 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 HF eps Pr(>F[HF]) fB 1.2438 6.6...

...x 2 5 x 2 6 x etc I'm wanting to test for Sphericity (because I've read that you should - is this routine in a repeated measures ANOVA?) and can see that Anova.mlm in the CAR package offers this in addition to the alternative Greenhouse and Feldt tests. I just don't really know how to perform the test - can someone give me some help. Thank you. Paul Dept of Ophthalmology Uni Melbourne, Australia -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Q-about-how-to-use-Anova.mlm-tp21739443p21739443.html Sent from the R help mailing...