search for: feinerman

Anyone, can you say what was the reason to rename bytecode? I am still interesting in 2010/9/29 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> Hi Ariel, > As long as I know English the word "bit" is a "small pice", . Why in set of > documentation ir is "bytecode", in other set or llvm source is "bitecode"? > What is the right? Different people call the

Chris rewrote the original LLVM bytecode into it's present bitcode form. The newer code is much smaller than the previous form. That would be my guess for why he chose to call it bitcode. Of course, he can say for himself. :-) -bw On Sep 29, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Ariel Feinerman wrote: > Anyone, > > can you say what was the reason to rename bytecode? I am still interesting in > > 2010/9/29 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Ariel, > > > As long as I know English the word "bit" is a "small pice", . Why in set of...

Hi list, As long as I know English the word "bit" is a "small pice", . Why in set of documentation ir is "bytecode", in other set or llvm source is "bitecode"? What is the right? Different people call the same thing such differently. -- best regards Ariel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, sorry, if I post to the unrelated list. I wish to use code::blocks with the llvm compilers on Windows to use Objective-C 2.0. There are several runtimes with differences in API, how do clang-llvm, llvm-gcc know the type of runtime? I wish to use Apple objc4, is it possible? -- best regards Ariel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, sorry, if I post to the unrelated list. I wish to use code::blocks with the llvm compilers on Windows to use Objective-C 2.0. There are several runtimes with differences in API, how do clang-llvm, llvm-gcc know the type of runtime? I wish to use Apple objc4, is it possible? -- best regards Ariel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: