search for: feffffffffff

...netdev=eth4 bridge=xenbr4 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=5 netdev=eth5 bridge=xenbr5 When i done brct show i have this : bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif0.0 peth0 xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no vif0.1 peth1 xenbr2 8000.feffffffffff no...

...ackets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Shouldn''t there are a peth0, ...? # brctl showstp xenbr0 xenbr0 bridge id 8000.feffffffffff designated root 8000.feffffffffff root port 0 path cost 0 max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00 hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00 forward delay...

...ow and it''s normal state. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root@xen-test ~]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif1.0 peth0 vif0.0 How can I fix it? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...th domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no eth0.97 vif5.1 xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif0.0 peth0 vif5.0 my domU has an interface in xen-vl97 which owns eth0.97. Only ping is working unless I do a tcpdump -i eth0.97 .... any clue? Thx in advance...

...two bridges, like so -- bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xen-br0 8000.0040f4ce392f no eth1 vif5.0 vif9.0 xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no vif5.1 vif9.1 Bridge xenbr1 does not have an IP assigned, as I want vif5.1, vif9.1 to be on an "untethered" bridge so it is isolated from dom0 -- [root@teegeeack ~]# ifconfig xenbr1 xenbr1 Link encap:Ethern...

...fine except that eth0 is not seen: ifconfig eth0 eth0: error fetching interface information: Device not found - "ifconfig -a" shows lo and sit0 only - on dom0: brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 vif1.0 - domU image contains...

...: bash-3.00# brctl show xenbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.000000000000 no and after DomU is started: bash-3.00# brctl show xenbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif1.0 Am I missing interfaces on the bride, like vif0.0 for example? -- Hans _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello all, I would like to use two network interfaces. It is working but I notice that both bridges hace the same id. #brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 vif10.0 xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no peth1 vif0.1...

Hi, [1] Are there guides for setting up a virtual switch for use in between guest domains in Xen ? [2] In Xen, is it possible for a guest domain to perform a initial dhcp IP lookup from another guest domain ? How are the configurations like ? Are there references or step procedures ? Kindly advice. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

...xenbr0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif0.0 peth0 vif3.0 172.30.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.30.1.16 default via 172.30.1.1 dev eth0 Kernel IP routing table Destination Gat...

Hi, I have two physical machines connected through a switch in a 192.168.1.* subnet. Dom0''s are assigned static ip addresses 192.168.1.100, 192.168.1.101 respectively. Dom0''s can ping each other. Each physical machine has a domu guest and static address assigned to domu''s are 192.168.1.200, 192.168.1.201 respectively. However domu''s can neither ping each other

...l Lan ( where Dhcp , DNs , Cobbler - Kick Start Server Resides ) I''ve Set xend-config.xsp to create xenbr1 on eth1 and it looks well So Guest May Get Access TO ALl Resources via the Bridge. brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no vif1.0 peth1 vif0.0 Tried To Install Guest Via Virt-Install virt-install -p --location "http://10.0.0.3/cblr/links/CentOS-5.2-xen-x86_64" -b xenbr1 -m &...

...(Guests network packets were not forwarded to physical ethernet connection on eth0) My bridge setup looked like this: root@quadxeon2:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.003048359fc0 no peth0 xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vm01 Of course this can not work. I changed the client vif setup from; if = [''mac=00:16:3e:12:af:01, bridge=xenbr0, vifname=vm01'' ] to: if = [''mac=00:16:3e:12:af:01, bridge=eth0, vifname=vm01'' ] root@quadxeon2:~# brctl show bridge name...

...have: (network-script ''network-bridge bridge=br-inet'') (vif-script ''vif-bridge bridge=br-inet'') I also have a script which brings up br-dmz bridge on dummy0 # brctl show: bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br-dmz 8000.feffffffffff no agustina0 hades1 pdummy0 br-inet 8000.feffffffffff no hades0 peth0...

...0/24 dev ath0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.200.102 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 default via 192.168.200.1 dev ath0 [root@wing godwing]# /usr/sbin/brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.feffffffffff yes vif1.0 xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 [root@wing godwing]# /sbin/route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168...

Hello, my current network setup looks like the following: dom2-eth0 (172.30.1.22) netmask /24 | | xen-br1 (no ip) | dom1-eth0 (172.30.1.21) netmask /24 dom1-eth1 (172.30.0.21) netmask /24 | | xen-br10 (172.30.0.1) netmask /24 | dom0 | | xen-br0 (normal IP) | eth0 (same IP as xen-br0) |

Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)

...:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenl%G�%@ge:0 RX bytes:1474 (1.4 KiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no pvlan100 vif0.0 a ping to an other machine is fine But i can''t ssh to any other machine. I started tracing on another machine and ethereal shows an incorrect TCP checksum. And the TCP checksum is this case seem...

...lft forever preferred_lft forever 16: xenbr1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no peth1 vif0.1 10.150.8.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.150.8.158 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 10.175.8.0/21 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.175....

Before starting xend (xen 3.0) these are my correct network interfaces: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:04 inet addr:192.168.1.51 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:05 inet addr:192.168.1.52 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet