search for: feehapk

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)        ...

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

This is my install profile F11.install name="FC11-G1S2" memory=500 disk = [''phy:/dev/sda3,0,w'' ] vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc,vncunused=1''] kernel = "/etc/xen/vm/vmlinuz.1" ramdisk = "/etc/xen/vm/initrd.img.1" vcpus=1 on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart''

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

hi all, When i tried to install debian as a new guest VM in paravirtualized mode on Xen the following error occurs. please help me to resolve the problem.. Unable to complete install ''<type ''exceptions.ValueError''> Invalid install location: Opening URL http://172.16.0.31:8088/debian1 failed.. Traceback (most recent call last):   File

I have 4 guest VMs installed on 1 host. One of them is Vyatta (VC5). Currently we are using default Xen-bridge for communication between VMs(inter-domain or intra-domain). I want to assign Vyatta(a guest VM) exclusively to replace Xen-bridging for VM to VM communication. Means the traffic sent from guest-1 to guest-2 bypass briging and route through vyatta(VM), instead of going to Dom0. As

Hi There, I''ve installed xen 3 and xen-tools on my Debian etch server and all seems well, until I try to start a guest domain. debian:/home/xen# xm create /etc/xen/D4G3.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/D4G3.cfg". Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. I get the error: "Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device

Does xen virtualize wireless networks, and if not, why not? What is so difficult about it? Regards! Fasiha Ashraf Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Is there any GUI interface to create guest VMs in Debian etch (Xen) like Virtual Machine Manager in Fedora 8 Regards Fasiha Ashraf Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

My lenny guests don''t ping gateway. this is where I have found some probe HPCNL-SR-3:/etc/init.d# brctl showstp eth0 eth0  bridge id              8000.001b210d6131  designated root        8000.001b210d6131  root port                 0                    path cost                  0  max age                  20.00                 bridge max age            20.00  hello time               

I have 3.4.2 Dom0(kenel 2.6.31-rc6) on top of fedora11 xend has started [root@HPCNL-SR-2 xen]# xm list Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s) Domain-0                                     0  7607     8     r-----    232.6 But i am unable to create PV guest in anyway. my virt-manager not working if i clicked its launcher in system tools. Even while using