search for: fedorapeople

...he virt tools will obviously keep going without me, but I'm just sending this note to say that I have put mirrors for the following git repositories up in case the primary git repo has any problems. Primary Mirror http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=summary http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=rjones/public_git/febootstrap.git;a=summary http://git.annexia.org/?p=hivex.git;a=summary http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=rjones/public_git/hivex.git;a=summary http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=summary http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=rjones/pu...

...get flushed out. Easily verified by sticking > PUSH_KICK's everywhere. I do not believe that that is the problem, in my case it clearly seems to be a pitch / swizzle problem rather then a synchronizarion problem, here is what my desktop with gnome shell looks like when using DRI2: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nv46-gnome-shell-good.jpg And this is what it looks like when using DRI3: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nv46-gnome-shell-bad.jpg The DRI2 screenshot is made with Mario's 2 patches on top of current master: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2015-July/021740...

...> > cp pc-bios/optionrom/linuxboot_dma.bin pc-bios/optionrom/ > > I mean: > > cp pc-bios/optionrom/linuxboot_dma.bin pc-bios/ Yep, that did it. Thanks! I see about 1.35 seconds time improvement, with `supermin` from Git + QEMU & the add patch[1]. https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/virt/stdouts/faster-supermin-custom-qemu-appliance-boot-analysis.txt This is with `supermin` from F23, and QEMU from Git (without adding the 'optionrom' patch): https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/virt/stdouts/supermin-f23-without-add-optionrom-patch-boot-analysis.txt [1] https://...

...C that one is known to not >> work, >> I guess I can give it a try. > > Compute support is not supported on GK110+, yeah... > > If you provide me a MMT trace of, for example, vectorAdd from the CUDA samples I could have a look. Ok, here is a MMT trace of vectorAdd: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/vectorAdd.log.gz Regards, Hans

...dora 19 beta, x86_64), it works fine. When I compile it with gcc -fplugin=dragonegg, I get an executable that doesn't seem to execute the printf inside the loop. The C program, executables from gcc and gcc -fplugin=dragonegg, and disassemblies of the .o files can be found here: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/dragonegg/ If anyone would care to take a look at this, I can provide account credentials to ssh into the system I'm using. Thanks! Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130...

...ing into the ether? > > > Sorry I only included a small bit of the program in my original mail > because I found the use of "MOV" instructions to load constants > suspicious, is that normal ? > > I've put a log with NV50_PROG_DEBUG=1 output here: > > https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.log > > nvdisasm -b SM30 for the generated binary code is here: > > https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.disasm > > There are already .tgsi, .hex and .bin files there if > you find those easier to use then the > NV50_PROG_DEBUG=1 output. > >...

...o get some TGSI compute >> code to work. The code from mesa/src/gallium/tests/trivial.c >> works. >> >> So now I'm trying to get a "native" tgsi kernel to run via >> clover, I'm using Francisco's nbody.c example for this: >> >> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.c >> >> Which does not work, at first I thought there was an issue >> with the setup of the input / output buffers, but that seems to >> work fine, and moreover I finally got the smart idea to look >> in dmesg, which says: >> >> [ 9920...

...more recently, to this fedora thread where clang/llvm -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE support is claimed to be only partial: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2020 I dig into the glibc headers in order to have a better understanding of what's going on, and wrote my notes here: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/fortify_source_requirements.rst TL;DR: clang does provide a similar compile-time checking as gcc, but no runtime checking. To assert that I wrote a small test suite: https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/fortify-test-suite And indeed, clang doesn't pass it, mostly because it turns cal...

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:03:37 +0200 Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11.04.2015 11:29, Fl@sh wrote: > > Unknown sefault: > > http://itmag.es/2HxqM > > > > Why this might happen? > > Maybe i'm close last virConnectRef in threads? (but this is > > unlikely). Or maybe another reason? > > > > Doesn't ring any bell to

hi guys, I came across Gerd Hoffmann's repo at http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/el5/ which seems to have a much newer KVM for EL5 - has anyone managed to get that working ? Even trying with the kver he used ( 2.6.18-53.el5 ) does not seem to satisfy all required symbols. - KB

Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/ or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)? or is someone willing to take over building the rpm the old fashioned way from https://github.com/xvitaly/steamrpm ? I am to relocate to another town for new job and can not afford the spare time :-/ -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (...

Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora''s Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It''s not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops

...anything, except for the important things which always go under the radar unnoticed) I ripped the r1000 rpm from rpmforge and created a dkms based rpm for the r8168 driver. Since others might find a use for it too, I have uploaded the rpm (and it's corresponding source) at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/dkms-r8168/. I am also thinking of linking to it from the above mentioned wiki page. What do you think ? Manuel

I'm running version 3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. The official(?) RPMs ship two init scripts, glusterd and glusterfsd. I've googled a bit, and I can't figure out what the purpose is for each of them. I know that I need one of them, but I can't tell which for sure. There's no man page for either, and running them with --help returns the same exact output. Do they have separate

...>virsh -V > > Virsh command line tool of libvirt 0.10.2 > > I've pushed test builds of mingw-virt-viewer packaging libvirt 1.1.2 if you want > to give them a try to see if they work better (disclaimer: I haven't tested > these installers at all). Pushed to http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ ;) Christophe

...; have an exit and it just goes off executing into the ether? Sorry I only included a small bit of the program in my original mail because I found the use of "MOV" instructions to load constants suspicious, is that normal ? I've put a log with NV50_PROG_DEBUG=1 output here: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.log nvdisasm -b SM30 for the generated binary code is here: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.disasm There are already .tgsi, .hex and .bin files there if you find those easier to use then the NV50_PROG_DEBUG=1 output. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:00 PM,...

Hello, I am working on my PhD thesis and it would be really helpfull if someone could advise me, whether can Virsh create snapshots of VMs using copy-on-write. Thanks for reply. Juraj

...; >> Sorry I only included a small bit of the program in my original mail >> because I found the use of "MOV" instructions to load constants >> suspicious, is that normal ? >> >> I've put a log with NV50_PROG_DEBUG=1 output here: >> >> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.log >> >> nvdisasm -b SM30 for the generated binary code is here: >> >> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nbody.disasm >> >> There are already .tgsi, .hex and .bin files there if >> you find those easier to use then the >> NV5...

...;   >     >      [2][15]xen@lists.fedoraproject.org >   >     >      [3][1][16]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen >   >     > >   >     > References >   >     > >   >     >    Visible links >   >     >    1. [2][17]http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm >   >     >    2. file:///mc/compose?to=[18]xen@lists.fedoraproject.org >   >     >    3. [3][19]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen >   > >   >     > -- >   >     > xen maili...

...rywhere. >> >> >> I do not believe that that is the problem, in my case it clearly >> seems to be a pitch / swizzle problem rather then a synchronizarion >> problem, here is what my desktop with gnome shell looks like when >> using DRI2: >> >> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nv46-gnome-shell-good.jpg >> >> And this is what it looks like when using DRI3: >> >> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/nv46-gnome-shell-bad.jpg >> >> The DRI2 screenshot is made with Mario's 2 patches on top of >> current master: &gt...