search for: fedora1

If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following: Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" #ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img" memory = 128 name = "fedora1" #dhcp = "dhcp" disk = [''file:/root/fedora/fed...

Hi, im using a fedora core 8 domU and fedora core 8 as my dom0 on xen3.1.0-13, my config file reads: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.21-2950.fc8xen" ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.21-2950.fc8xen-no-scsi.img" memory = 428 name = "fedora1.fc8" vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:00:00:03,ip=192.168.2.105'' ] dhcp = "off" netmask = "255.255.255.0" gateway = "192.168.2.102" disk = [''file:/xen/fedora1/fedora.fc8.img,sda1,w'', ''file:/xen/fedora1/fedora.swap,sda2,w''...

...inux (4) GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz 3399 MHZ Arch: EM64T Cache: 1024 KB Vendor: GenuineIntel Memory: 2000 MB Stepping: 1 Family: 15 Swap: 4000 MB I see that you have it for Unix machines and that you have it for the following linux platforms: Red Hat i386 8/9/Fedora1/Fedora2/Fedora3 Martyn Plummer x86_64 Fedora1 James Henstridge x86_64 Fedora3 Brian Ripley i386 Enterprise Linux Matthew P. Cox Could I use the Fedore 3 x86_64 version? Thanks for you attention and help. D- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I have a problem with a CentOS 4 and now updated to 4.1 server, every so often the other servers try to contact it and this not there a retry and it is, like it goes to sleep, I have no problem with the fedora1, RH9 and slackware machines they just never do this. its most annoying.. they all use IP's not names. all access lists are identical, all hosts files are identical, all exports and fstabs are same format. in fact one of the machines on another network altogether reponds instantly. if I reboo...

With Centos3, fedora1/2 I have been able to put /boot on a RAID1 partition and have it boot normally. Unlike earlier versions that used lilo as the default boot loader, these did not make the 2nd drive bootable but at least I was fairly confident that if the first drive failed I could use the install CD in rescue mode...

...Ive checked the logs, and found that it could be related to SE Linux and I tryed to disable it, but it still doesnt work. Im not using iptables localy, so, its not iptables related. Already tryed uninstall <> install. Any trick here? Thanks a lot. Gustavo. BTW: Its currently working on my fedora1. This is the last thing I need to fix to upgrade.

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20060709/4955ef3d/attachment.pgp

I originally posted this to R-help, but here is probably a better place. I have a rather complex routine which works great in R. Then I bootstrap it. After running a few minutes it typically segfaults, though it happens very randomly. This happens w/ 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 on Fedora1 and a Scyld (RH7.3) system. Traces always point back to routines in src/main/memory.c, though often not the same routines. Now for the strangeness: It's never the same routines that appear in the trace. The trace gives sequential routine names that aren't called by previous routines. A...

...isited compiz on aiglx and at this point, if you're running rawhide (fedora development), it's a matter of installing the i386 RPM found here: http://people.redhat.com/krh/compiz/ There's a SRPM there too for other architectures, rebuild using rpmbuild --rebuild compiz-0.0.13.fedora1-3.src.rpm To run compiz, first start the gnome-window-decorator process in the background, then run compiz as compiz --replace gconf I have an FC5 repository for those who want to try it out on FC5, but I need to dust it off and actually rebuild the relevant packages there. I'll send ou...

I have a Win2K Server that acts as a file server to a bunch of Macintosh machines on the network. Today I installed samba-3.0.5 on a Fedora1 machine, and mounted one of the server shares and tried to read it. Much to my surprise, I found files that are being listed like this: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 13 16:30 Icon?* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 25649 Aug 23 2000 webslide151.gif* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 57619 Mar 26 08:22 ???w...

Hi, I'm using * with the latest CVS image as of this afternoon on Fedora1. I am using snom 200's with the latest firmware. When I dial the voicemail extension and try to enter my password, * does not receive the password. The console complains about not receiving the password. Also, when I try to leave voicemail messages there seems to be no talk path and the record...

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1">Hi List<br> <br> </font> <pre

...it''s 8G in size. #lvcreate -L8192M -s -n snap1 vg0 #mount /dev/vg0/snap1 /mnt do some copying files here #umount /mnt #lvremove /dev/vg0/snap1 not removed! it says can''t allocated memory #xm mem-set 0 512 #lvremove /dev/vg0/snap1 now it removed successfully #lvcreate -L4096M -n fedora1 vg0 System lockup at this point. I have to login from another terminal. I couldn''t kill the lvcreate process, couln''t do anything lvm. I have to reboot the machine. My vg0 is on /dev/md1, which is a software raid 1. My dom0 os is fedora core 4. Xen version is 3.0-testing So...

...wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:59 +1000, Res wrote: >> I have a problem with a CentOS 4 and now updated to 4.1 server, >> every so often the other servers try to contact it and this not there a >> retry and it is, like it goes to sleep, I have no problem with the >> fedora1, RH9 and slackware machines they just never do this. > I haven't seen this issue ... but it might actually be sleeping. > > CentOS-4 uses a 2.6.9-x kernel that is much better at doing what your > BIOS says for power saving mode than 2.4 kernels were. I would first > check the s...