search for: fedo

...it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is >> because it is already available in a supplementary channel from >> RHEL for C 6. >> >> Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6? >> >> https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedo >> ra-linux/ >> > Just curious - why are you using the epel, rather than google, > release for centos-7? > > The current google repo releases, (which install without any issues > and work well on centos-7) are: > > stable.x86_64 62.0.3202.94-1 > beta.x86_6...

...workstation. However, it is not available in EPEL as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is because it is already available in a supplementary channel from RHEL for C 6. Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6? https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/

...; available in EPEL as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is > because it is already available in a supplementary channel from > RHEL for C 6. > > Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6? > > https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedo > ra-linux/ > Just curious - why are you using the epel, rather than google, release for centos-7? The current google repo releases, (which install without any issues and work well on centos-7) are: stable.x86_64 62.0.3202.94-1 beta.x86_64 63.0.3239.59-1 while the epel one is...

...derstand, this is > >> because it is already available in a supplementary channel from > >> RHEL for C 6. > >> > >> Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6? > >> > >> https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedo > >> ra-linux/ > >> > > Just curious - why are you using the epel, rather than google, > > release for centos-7? > > > > The current google repo releases, (which install without any issues > > and work well on centos-7) are: > > > > stab...

...t; >> because it is already available in a supplementary channel from >> >> RHEL for C 6. >> >> >> >> Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6? >> >> >> >> https://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedo >> >> ra-linux/ >> >> >> > Just curious - why are you using the epel, rather than google, >> > release for centos-7? >> > >> > The current google repo releases, (which install without any issues >> > and work well on centos-7) are...

Hello All, I' have a laptop who's not booting to graphical screen today. Actualy I had several the last few days, related to cr repo. This one won't update, EM: updates | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 epel/x86_64/updateinfo FAILED https://mirror.ynet.sk/epel/7/x86_64/repodata/3ada5bcbccaa9772074a773b15bd01dd48e753a184ebecfed590de6c389ada03-updateinfo.xml.bz2: [Errno 14] curl#7 -

...t;> >> Secondly, Once I have manually started libvirtd, when I try to define a >> domain it gives me an error "could not find capabilities for arch=x86_64 >> domaintype=xen" and I haven't yet been able to define any domains. This >> domain type works fine on Fedora 21. >> >> Thirdly, I am unable to convert to/from xml config format, it gives me >> the error "error: invalid argument: unsupported config type xen-xl" however >> the format "xen-xl" works fine on the Fedora 21 machine. >> > > It sounds like...

...but it will not auto-start on reboot. Secondly, Once I have manually started libvirtd, when I try to define a domain it gives me an error "could not find capabilities for arch=x86_64 domaintype=xen" and I haven't yet been able to define any domains. This domain type works fine on Fedora 21. Thirdly, I am unable to convert to/from xml config format, it gives me the error "error: invalid argument: unsupported config type xen-xl" however the format "xen-xl" works fine on the Fedora 21 machine. I had these same issues when I tried to upgrade to Fedora 25 and...