search for: fedd

...8.1.4 > Try adding: > > features: nesting=1 > > that is the default for new container for PVE7 onward, but not added > automatically for PVE6 containers. Thank you, nesting is set to 1. Is there anything else we could check? Really wary to make it privileged though. Regards, fedd

...inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0c:29:dd:52:71 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.32.1.201/24 brd 10.32.1.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fedd:5271/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever # testparm -s | grep interfaces interfaces = 10.32.1.201/255.255.255.0 Now change the server's IP address by editing ifcfg-eth0 and smb.conf to change 10.32.1.201 to 10.32.1.200. Reboot the server. # service smb statu...

...s br11 8000.c03fd561c8ec yes eno1.11 vnet1 vnet1 being the interface of the connected vm. When the VM is booted, the following error is received. [ OK ] Reached target Paths. [ OK ] Reached target Basic System. [ 33.874572] IPv6: eth0: IPv6 duplicate address 2001:db8:0:11:5054:ff:fedd:a617 detected! Any address assigned to the interface immediately triggers a dadfailed warning such as: 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:dd:a6:17 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 2001:db8:0:11::200/64 scope global...

Hello, I am experiencing a strange behaviour that I think might be a bug. I was advised to consult the mailing list instead of trying to file a bug, so here it is. I have a user `kate` which is both a member of a `family` group and a `feddkate` group. There is a share called `FeddAndKate` which I what to be accessible to the `feddkate` group but not to a `family` group, and I've set up the permissions accordingly. Everything works as expected when kate, fedd or others log in via ssh, but Samba fails to adhere the permissions...

...4 Destination Host Unreachable It like the virtual instance is there, and then gone. Here is the output of ifconfig on the dom0: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:DD:BF:E6 inet addr:192.168.0.15 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fedd:bfe6/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:100938 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:105438 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:22554988 (21.5 MiB) TX bytes...

heres a quote from an email about this hosting company who requested that their site be listed in the links section of the website i run for a band on Homstead. Both me and the band said no. mostly cause theres no point, and the guy i got an email from seemed to be rude. > Whilst you're very much entitled to your opinion we have a large number of > users who would prefer to use these