search for: fe17

I'm having a problem getting outbound trunking to work using asterisk and an external SIP FXO. 7 digit dialing produces the following output: -- Executing Dial("SIP/mitel-fe17", "SIP/5925660@mediatrix-1204") in new stack -- Called 5925660@mediatrix-1204 -- SIP/mediatrix-1204-645e answered SIP/mitel-fe17 -- Attempting native bridge of SIP/mitel-fe17 and SIP/mediatrix-1204-645e -- Got SIP response 481 "Call-Leg Does Not Exist" back from 172.20....

...ith the newer release of OpenSSL. The IMAP client doesn't matter. For the time being I have gone back to .13 linked against older OpenSSL. In the logs I see messages like the following... dovecot: Apr 16 23:12:18 Info: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933, lip=2001:470:1d:8c::2, TLS handshaking: Disconnected -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

...e if you configure static NAT entries (in the "nat" file) on an interface that has IPv6 addresses assigned. Here''s the error message from "shorewall restart": [...] Activating Rules... Adding IP Addresses... /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 244: 0 | fe80::20d:48ff:fe17:58 : syntax error in expression (error token is "::20d:48ff:fe17:58 ") /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 360: & -4294967296 : syntax error: operand expected (error token is "& -4294967296 ") IP Address 10.101.173.164 added to interface eth0 Here''s "i...

...00 link/ether 96:00:00:17:06:a4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 116.203.40.3/32 brd 116.203.40.3 scope global dynamic eth0 valid_lft 84360sec preferred_lft 84360sec inet6 2a01:4f8:1c0c:7c6c::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::9400:ff:fe17:6a4/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever I tried a lot of things from differnt howtos, but only with no success. What the next steps to running docker with ipv6? Thx. Joe

How much of an impact can/does local network traffic have on call quality? Would opening large files on local servers affect call quality? We are running QoS on the router but that will only prioritize traffic in/out of the network.

...; vif0.0 > xenbrloc1 8000.feffffffffff no vif2.0 > > vif1.1 Output of ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 48:5B:39:17:09:73 inet addr:192.168.1.119 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::4a5b:39ff:fe17:973/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:392 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:363 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:104964 (102.5 KiB) TX bytes:50630 (4...

...ff:fe52:ed49/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:07:e9:17:84:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.1/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1 inet6 fe80::207:e9ff:fe17:8486/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 ip route show 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 24.225.144.0/20 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 24.225.153....

Hi, we are using Tinc in our Freifunk Network in Oldenburg for internode connections over the internet. So Tinc is running on OpenWrt 10.03 on Dlink Dir-300 Routers. We all have enough internet bandwith (1,6 MB/sec and more) but we only get a maximum speed of ~350KB/sec between two tinc nodes because then tinc uses 99% of the cpu. Is it possible to get more Speed with tinc on this machines?

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info <volname> 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > On a side note, try recently released health

On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all the three machines. On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster > Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next

...3-96ca-60a988eb9358/D6F65DA11FDF544AE55620609C3807ED5482C968 (58b1a270-b68b-4a23-b545-b1f90b852bcd) on home-client-2 [2017-10-25 10:14:13.022698] W [MSGID: 108015] [afr-self-heal-entry.c:56:afr_selfheal_entry_delete] 0-home-replicate-0: expunging file a3f5a769-8859-48e3-96ca-60a988eb9358/DB3A25C7B4FFE17F4792DF7465622AE67DCEF5B2 (ede79cd9-f4eb-4858-813d-1f76ba8d8f6e) on home-client-2 [2017-10-25 10:14:13.038221] W [MSGID: 108015] [afr-self-heal-entry.c:56:afr_selfheal_entry_delete] 0-home-replicate-0: expunging file a3f5a769-8859-48e3-96ca-60a988eb9358/84AFAB3C7BC95DE1D4640CF13A4A3C9290094B0C (ff42...