search for: fe16dd5b

On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:46 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I've been looking at benchmarks of LLVM recently, and overall they look pretty good. Aside from things that use OpenMP or benefit from autovectorisation, Clang/LLVM and GCC seem to come fairly close, with no overall winner. Nice. Thanks. > > But: there do seem to have been a number of performance

Hello Everyone, I've been looking at benchmarks of LLVM recently, and overall they look pretty good. Aside from things that use OpenMP or benefit from autovectorisation, Clang/LLVM and GCC seem to come fairly close, with no overall winner. But: there do seem to have been a number of performance regressions between 2.9 and 3.0: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1110178-AR-1110173AR66

...percentage next to the "losers" ? Thanks for taking the time of doing this anyway, I'm looking forward to the final article. -- Matthieu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111116/fe16dd5b/attachment.html>