search for: fdupes

Sorry, accidentally deleted the previous message so have to write this as new, rather than reply. At any rate, my CentOS 5.6 installation shows fdupes as available through rpmforge. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Angel: Acathla turned to stone, as demons sometimes do, and was buried where neither man nor demon would want to look...unless,...

...way to do this? > > It sure would be nice if dovecot could perform this on a per account and/or > per maildir/mailbox case with a simple doveadm command... The basic question is: what is a duplicate? I spot 100% duplicates within the same Maildir mailbox with a script similiar to "fdupes" http://linux.die.net/man/1/fdupes . Because an user may copy messages around, I scan one mailbox at a time. For some rare cases, where I merge two accounts, I use a script, that looks for the message id in one account and removes all messages with the same id in the other account. Than I m...

...t as server to the Linux rsync client. I want to avoid transferring duplicated data, as the DSL link is a far more significant factor than computation/disk IO. I can't work out whether rsync (or any patch) will make it smart enough to spot duplicate files, regardless of file location (like fdupes or similar). Because this is coming off a network drive there's no way I can "hard link" (or NTFS equivalent) duplicates on the source tree, so it needs to happen in rsync. I've tried using the --detect-renamed patch on 3.0.0 in the following (made up) set up: src/ src/dup s...

I've seen fslint and fdupes recommended for this in CentOS, but neither seem to be available as packages. Is anyone using either under CentOS-5.6? It seems that they are available in the rpmfusion-free repository, but as far as I can see this is not functioning with CentOS at present. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /...

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

Hi all, I am starting fresh with a local repository of mails, which almost certainly have duplicates in them. I am going to use maildirs, and ensure all mails are input with CRLFs. The question is: does anybody know how I can find and remove duplicates, either while injecting mail with IMAP, or afterward? I can use tools to find duplicate Message-IDs, but don't know of a way to remove

Hi, Say I download a large file from the net to /mnt/a.iso. I then download the same file again to /mnt/b.iso. These files now have the same content, but are stored twice since the copies weren''t made with the bcp utility. The same occurs if a directory tree with duplicate files (created with bcp) is put through a non-aware program - for example tarred and then untarred again. This

...k. All files are transferred and the delta copy output is the same size as the local compared directory. I would rather not use --size-only for obvious reasons (eh, 1, 0, what's the difference?) Example: rsync -v -a --checksum --compare-dest=/original /modified delta-backup I could use fdupes to build a list instead, but it would be nice if rsync would would. Please correct me, document if this is true, or fix it. Other ideas? -- # Jesse Molina # Mail = jesse at opendreams.net # Page = page-jesse at opendreams.net # Cell = 1.602.323.7608 # Web = http://www.opendreams.net/jesse/

I imagine we can save some space on our file server by cleaning up all the files that are saved multiple times by different people. There is already the fdupes command in linux that will scan a directory tree and report what files have duplicates. This could be easily scripted to turn those duplicate files into symlinks to one file. The problem is see, then, is what would happen if someone tries to change a duplicate file that they think is their own...

...be nice if dovecot could perform this on a per account and/or per maildir/mailbox case with a >>> simple doveadm command... >> >> The basic question is: what is a duplicate? >> >> I spot 100% duplicates within the same Maildir mailbox with a script similiar to "fdupes" >> http://linux.die.net/man/1/fdupes . >> Because an user may copy messages around, I scan one mailbox at a time. >> >> For some rare cases, where I merge two accounts, I use a script, that looks for the message id in one account and >> removes all messages with...

...retrieval) or use Heiko's approach, because mv is atomic on the same filesystem (rename instead of copy). The next problem comes with duplicates, because Maildir saves flags, keywords and status in the filename. I, therefore, copy a backup to another subdir, say "tmp2", then run fdupes (or similiar program) over cur, new and tmp2 to find duplicates, delete them in tmp2, and finally "mv -i " (you never know ;-) ) the remaining files from tmp2 to cur or new. > -----Original Message----- >> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 23:36:52 +0100 >> From: Heiko Schlitterma...

I have a dovecot 2.0 dovecot server set up for https/imap with spam, av, and some preliminary sieve filters in place. Our current email is outsourced and so we have used POP3 to keep all email on our systems for many years. I have run tests to move mail to the new imap server and that seems to work pretty well. However, we have lots of mail going back over a decade and used a lot of aliases

Hi, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> (Do 12 Nov 2015 23:31:39 CET): > According to a message to this list from Oli Schacher, > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-June/059493.html, all I need to do is copy the deleted > emails to their original folder and dovecot will take care of it: > ? > > exactly, just copy the mail from your backup back into the users > >