Displaying 20 results from an estimated 151 matches for "fdr".
Did you mean:
fd
2004 Dec 20
1
[BioC] limma, FDR, and p.adjust
...9;m not sure what more can be
said, except that you should read the article Wright (1992), which is cited in the help entry for
p.adjust(), and which explains quite clearly the concept of an adjusted p-value.
The idea that you're having trouble with actually has nothing specifically to do with FDR or with
B&H's (1995) method. Any adjustment method for multiple testing can be expressed in terms of
adjusted p-values. The function p.adjust() actually implements several adjustment methods, not
just B&H's, where were not expressed in terms of p-values in their original papers....
2004 Dec 20
1
Re: [BioC] limma, FDR, and p.adjust
Mark,
there is a fdr website link via Yoav Benjamini's homepage which is: http://www.math.tau.ac.il/%7Eroee/index.htm
On it you can download an S-Plus function (under the downloads link) which calculates the false discovery rate threshold alpha level using stepup, stepdown, dependence methods etc.
Some changes are...
2004 Dec 19
1
limma, FDR, and p.adjust
...re
is a lot of confusion on this topic in both communities (having searched
the mail archives of both) and I am hoping that someone will have
information that can be shared with both communities.
I have seen countless questions on the BioC list regarding limma
(Bioconductor) and its calculation of FDR. Some of them involved
misunderstandings or confusions regarding across which tests the FDR
"correction" is being applied. My question is more fundamental and
involves how the FDR method is implemented at the level of "p.adjust"
(package: stats).
I have reread the paper by Benj...
2004 Dec 19
1
limma, FDR, and p.adjust
...re
is a lot of confusion on this topic in both communities (having searched
the mail archives of both) and I am hoping that someone will have
information that can be shared with both communities.
I have seen countless questions on the BioC list regarding limma
(Bioconductor) and its calculation of FDR. Some of them involved
misunderstandings or confusions regarding across which tests the FDR
"correction" is being applied. My question is more fundamental and
involves how the FDR method is implemented at the level of "p.adjust"
(package: stats).
I have reread the paper by Benj...
2007 Feb 28
2
topTable function from LIMMA
Dear R-Help,
I am using the function "topTable" from the LIMMA package. To estimate
adjusted P-values there are several options (adjust="fdr" , adjust="BH")
as shown below:
topTable(fit, number = 10, adjust = "BH", fit$Name)
I guess any of these options (fdr, BH, etc.) is using a default of
FDR=0.05 which is quite conservative (i.e., very likely none of the
tested genes will be ranked as differentiall...
2011 Apr 05
0
Changing parameter in local fdr R code
I am using Efron's local fdr procedure. But, I want to change the null from
N(0,1) to N(0, 0.002). I can access the function but I have no idea what to
change. In other words, I want nulltype to be N(0,0.002) instead of N(0,1)
in his function. Anyone has any ideas. This is his code for the local fdr:
function (zz, bre = 120,...
2018 Jun 08
2
XRay FDR mode doesn’t log main thread calls
Hello,
I am initializing FDR mode and finalizing/flushing the buffers manually.
XRay does not log calls from the main thread unless there is a function
call after __xray_log_finalize(). This behavior is abnormal since one would
expect the trace file to contain all function calls made up to the point
when __xray_log_finalize()...
2010 Sep 20
1
Please help with this error - new to
I am getting the following error in my script. I am very very new to R and
have obtained this script from another person.
#read file in (dummy data)
starburst.plot<-function(affy.fold, affy.FDR)(ifelse( ((affy.fold) >=0),
-1*log10(affy.FDR), 1*log10(affy.FDR)))
starburst.plot<-function(meth.fold, meth.FDR)(ifelse( ((meth.fold) >=0),
-1*log10(meth.FDR), 1*log10(affy.FDR)))
At my next command, I get the following error:
> g.ex.affy <- starburst.plot(data(,"affy.FOLD&qu...
2010 Jul 13
6
permutation-based FDR
Hola a todos,
Tengo un pequeño problemilla...
Tengo unas 9000 variables que he contrastado con 1 en concreto con el test
de wilcoxon. He calculado el p-valor, y queria corregirlo con el
permutation-based FDR. He encontrado una funcion con R comp.fdr()que hace
esta corrección, pero te pide que le pongas las variables con las
observaciones y te hace el test (según he entendido). Yo solo quiero que me
calcule los q-valor. Sabeis como hacerlo?
Muchas gracias
Dolors
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2003 Nov 03
1
FDR in p.adjust
Hello,
I've a question about the fdr method in p.adjust: What is the threshold of
the FDR, and is it possible to change this threshold?
As I understand the FDR (please correct) it adjusts the p-values so that for
less than N% (say the cutoff is 25%) of the alternative hypothesis the Null
is in fact true.
thanks a lot for help,
+re...
2008 Jul 10
2
false discovery rate !
Dear All,
It is not a typical R question (though I use R for this) but I thought someone will help me. For the list of P values, I have calculated FDR using p.adjust() in R (bioconductor). But my FDR values are same for all the P values. When do we get same FDR values? Does the smallest P values should less than 1/N? (where N is the number of P values)
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Ezhil
2005 Sep 19
5
FDR analyses: minimum number of features
Dear List,
We are planning a genotyping study to be analyzed using false discovery
rates (FDRs) (See Storey and Tibshirani PNAS 2003; 100:9440-5). I am
interested in learning if there is any consensus as to how many
features (ie. how many P values) need to be studied before reasonably
reliable FDRs can be derived. Does anyone know of a citation where
this is discussed?
Bill Dupont
Will...
2010 Oct 07
1
FDR
Dear R users,
I am wondering about the following results:
> p.adjust(c(0.05,0.05,0.05),"fdr")
[1] 0.05 0.05 0.05
> p.adjust(c(0.05,0.04,0.03),"fdr")
[1] 0.05 0.05 0.05
Why does p.adjust(..., "fdr") not adjust p-values, if they are constant?
Does somebody have an explanation or can point to a reference?
Thanks in advance,
Will
2004 Dec 20
2
problems with limma
...bind(dd$AKR1C,dd$AKR2C,dd$AKR3C,dd$AKR1T,dd$AKR2T,dd$AKR3T)
> bas <- cbind(dd$NZW1C,dd$NZW2C,dd$NZW3C,dd$AKR1C,dd$AKR2C,dd$AKR3C)
> #
> design<-matrix(c(1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1),ncol=2)
> fit1 <- lmFit(nzw,design)
> fit1 <- eBayes(fit1)
> topTable(fit1,adjust="fdr",number=5)
M t P.Value B
12222 3679.480 121.24612 7.828493e-06 -4.508864
1903 3012.405 118.32859 7.828493e-06 -4.508866
9068 1850.232 92.70893 1.178902e-05 -4.508889
10635 2843.534 91.99336 1.178902e-05 -4.508890
561 18727.858 90.17085 1.178902e-05...
2004 Nov 18
3
Redirect standard input and output of R
...of writing anything
to R.
This program really works with the 'cat?? UNIX command, but it does not
work with R. What I??m doing wrong??? It is possible to do it???
I want to start R once and use it thousands of times... that??s why I??m
trying to use this system.
pipe(fdW);
pipe(fdR);
pid = fork();
if (pid==-1)
perror("Error fork");
if (pid==0)
{
close(0);
dup(fdW[0]);
close(fdW[0]);
close(fdW[1]);
close(1);
dup(fdR[1]);
close(fdR[1]);
close(fdR[0]);
execlp("R","R","--slave",NULL);
perror("Error ex...
2004 Nov 18
3
Redirect standard input and output of R
...of writing anything
to R.
This program really works with the 'cat?? UNIX command, but it does not
work with R. What I??m doing wrong??? It is possible to do it???
I want to start R once and use it thousands of times... that??s why I??m
trying to use this system.
pipe(fdW);
pipe(fdR);
pid = fork();
if (pid==-1)
perror("Error fork");
if (pid==0)
{
close(0);
dup(fdW[0]);
close(fdW[0]);
close(fdW[1]);
close(1);
dup(fdR[1]);
close(fdR[1]);
close(fdR[0]);
execlp("R","R","--slave",NULL);
perror("Error ex...
2018 Jun 11
2
XRay feature – fdr log flushing
Hello,
Also, I’ve noticed that FDR mode doesn’t flush to a log unless
programmatically configured to do so unlike basic mode, which flushes by
default. Would it be possible to add this feature as well?
Thanks,
Henry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermai...
2010 Aug 08
1
p.adjust( , fdr)
Hello,
I am not sure about the p.adjust( , fdr). How do these adjusted p-values
get?
I have read papers of BH method. For independent case, we compare the
ordered p-values with the alfa*i/m, where m is the number of tests. But I
have checked that result based on the adjusted p-values is different with
that by using the independent case method....
2017 Jun 04
2
building llvm_Rel400 on Scientific Linux (RHEL) 7.3 x86_64
...mpiler_rt_test(XRayUnitTests ${testname}
45 OBJECTS ${TEST_OBJECTS}
46 DEPS ${TEST_DEPS}
47 LINK_FLAGS ${TARGET_LINK_FLAGS}
48 -lstdc++ -lm ${CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT}
49 -lpthread
50 -L${COMPILER_RT_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIR} -lclang_rt.xray-fdr-${arch})
51 endif()
2005 Jul 14
2
Partek has Dunn-Sidak Multiple Test Correction. Is this the same/similar to any of R's p.adjust.methods?
...nted Dunn-Sidak and not the other methods that R has? Is there any
particular advantage to the Dunn-Sidak method?
R knows about these methods (in R 2.1.1):
> p.adjust.methods
[1] "holm" "hochberg" "hommel" "bonferroni" "BH" "BY" "fdr"
[8] "none"
BH is Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) and is also called "fdr" (I wish R's
documentation said this clearly). BY is Benjamini & Yekutieli (2001).
I found a few hits from Google on Dunn-Sidak, but I'm curious if anyone can
tell me on a "conserv...