Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "fdc2f950".
Did you mean:
fdc2195
2019 Jun 11
2
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
...t;>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190611/fdc2f950/attachment.html>
2019 Jun 11
2
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:37 AM Aaron Ballman <aaron.ballman at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sorry for the brevity, I am currently travelling and responding on a cell
> phone. I won't be able to give you a full accounting until later,
>
There is no hurry right now!
> but 1) I don't see a motivating problem this churn solves, 2) signed int
> does not represent the full size