search for: fcntl_lock

Hello, Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error. I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following: root@raven:/usr/local/samba/source/tests #gcc -m32 -o fcntl_lock fcntl_lock.c fcntl_lock.c: In function `main': fcntl_lock.c:43: storage size of `lock' isn't known fcntl_lock.c:55: `O_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function) fcnt...

Hi, I need help. I am running Caldera eServer 2.3 and cannot start samba. I used webmin and a get the following error Failed to start samba servers : /usr/sbin/nmbd failed I also tried to start it from the command line using samba start and it seems to be running, but I don't think it is. Any help is very much appriciated. thanks ===== Alexander W. Miranda Systems Engineer

...e(213) markk opened file markk/ntuser.ini read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=1) [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860) Transaction 1449 of length 75 [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 2570) [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1287) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 75 (Value too large for defined data type) [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1308) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 9223372036854775808 op 13 type 1 (Value too large for defined data type) [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] smbd/blocking.c:p...

...) add_posix_lock: File mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif: type = WRITE: start=0 size=4294967295: dev=833 inode=19598 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(1055) set_posix_lock: Real lock: Type = WRITE: offset = 0, count = 4294967295 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(650) posix_fcntl_lock 22 13 0 4294967295 1 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1308) fcntl_lock 22 13 0 4294967295 1 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1319) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 75 (Value too large for defined data type) [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] lib/util.c...

...er. I *really* don't want to do this, as Samba has been working so well for years now and billg is rich enough already. I am having problems with a windows client program that does a range lock on a file on a share. The log.smbd reports with debug level 3: [2003/12/02 17:20:23, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1632) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 75 (Value too large for defined data type) [2003/12/02 17:20:23, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1651) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 4294967284 count 1 op 13 type 1 (Value too large for defined data type) [2003/12/02 17:20:23, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94...

...eetwood samba]# smbcontrol nmbd reload-config params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb_all.conf" Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[profiles]" Processing section "[print$]" fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 13 type 0 (Resource temporarily unavailable) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED It does not come up for smbd. I have noticed this message in the winbind logs an awful lot: [2007/11/14 11:33:17, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:...

...g to get a 64 bit lock when only 32 bit locks are available. I've tried enabling and disabling oplocks to no avail. Is there a way to get samba to not advertise that 64bit locks are available, or otherwise resolve this? Thanks much, Thomas (logs are below): [2004/01/22 16:31:13, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1632) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 37 (No locks available) [2004/01/22 16:31:13, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1650) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 687 count 1 op 13 type 0 (No locks available ) [2004/01/22 16:31:13, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(656) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock...

Hello, When I want to use this command : < sudo smbcontrol winbindd offline> an error appears : " Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED fcntl_lock : lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 6 type 0 (Ressources temporairemnt non disponible) " I run Ubuntu 9.04 (32 and 64 bits), updated. Version of package Samba is 3.3.2-1ubuntu3 Have you ever seen this problem ? How do you resolve this ? Is it only on Ubuntu ? -- Sincerely, Thibaut MEYNIAL

.../27 08:51:32, 5] sam/idmap.c:smb_register_idmap(91) smb_register_idmap: Successfully added idmap backend 'tdb' [2005/06/27 08:51:32, 10] sam/idmap_tdb.c:db_idmap_init(500) db_idmap_init: Opening tdbfile /opt/local/samba/var/locks/winbindd_idmap.tdb [2005/06/27 08:51:33, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1815) fcntl_lock 8 34 0 1 2 [2005/06/27 08:51:33, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1850) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2005/06/27 08:51:33, 2] lib/tallocmsg.c:register_msg_pool_usage(56) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2005/06/27 08:51:33, 2] lib/dmallocmsg.c:register_dmalloc_msgs(71) Regist...

It has been my experience that only the owner of the file and root change change ACLS on that file. Since you've stated that Administrator IS the owner, maybe there's something else. Are you getting any errors ? Who is the owner of the diretory that the folder resides in. Is the Administrator given write permissions at the share level? My work-around for modifying ACL's was to

...ace lo ip=::1 bcast= netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff added interface lo ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 netmask=255.0.0.0 added interface bond0 ip=10.130.162.20 bcast=10.130.162.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 loaded services Netbios name list:- my_netbios_names[0]="FILZEN" fcntl_lock 9 6 0 1 1 fcntl_lock: Lock call successful Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd' Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam' Attempting to register passdb backend wbc_sam Successfully...

...================================= ===== [2007/01/31 17:15:03, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_list_groups(810) [ 0]: list groups [2007/01/31 17:15:03, 4] passdb/secrets.c:secrets_fetch_trust_account_password(282) Using cleartext machine password [2007/01/31 17:15:03, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1831) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) [2007/01/31 17:15:03, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1850) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 13 type 0 (Resource temporarily unavailable) [2007/01/31 17:15:03, 5] nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:receive_getdc_respon...

...smbldap_open_connection: ldap//localhost [2004/07/14 01:59:55, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(546) ldap_initialize: Time limit exceeded [2004/07/14 01:59:55, 1] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_retry_open(908) Connection to LDAP Server failed for the 1 try! [2004/07/14 01:59:55, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1646) fcntl_lock 7 13 0 1 1 [2004/07/14 01:59:55, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1681) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful I use idealx smbldap-populate to fill ldap directory

...d running. When I run winbind, winbind hangs and can only be killed by a kill -9 signal. Even 'wbinfo --own-domain' just hangs forever. Runing winbind in the foreground with -d 10 it seems to be constantly trying to connect to the DC and failing with Connecting to 172.18.1.18 at port 445 fcntl_lock 25 6 0 1 0 fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 6 type 0 (Resource temporarily unavailable) On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 5:19pm, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:25:55 -0500 (EST) > Paul Raines <raines...

...it received a ping message, but cannot reply because permission is denied. Which permission? $ sudo /usr/bin/smbcontrol -d 3 smbd ping <...> rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 1 op 6 type 0 (Resource temporarily unavailable) No replies received log.smbd: <...> [2016/03/31 10:00:27.153110, 1] ../source3/lib/messages.c:81(ping_message) INFO: Received PING messag...

...) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Call returned zero bytes (EOF) ) On the server side I see the following in the log: [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 3] smbd/server.c:main(831) loaded services [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 3] smbd/server.c:main(846) Becoming a daemon. [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1308) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1346) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 5] smbd/connection.c:claim_connection(156) claiming 0 [2003/05/06 12:23:11, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0...

...ock files = # No files are vetoed for oplock > grants On 2018-11-22 10:49 a.m., Jose Concha via samba wrote: > Thanks for the tip. Is veto oplocks different to oplocks = no? > > Just now I run into an error, but this time I have this log: > > ../lib/util/util.c:401(fcntl_lock) > fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (resource temporally unavailable) > fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 2147483646 count 1 op 37 type 1 (resource > temporally unavailable) > > Does this give you any clue of how the problem can be solved? > > The offset is the number I s...

...nton/Butzlaff/Wettbewerb Stifterverband/Marketing.doc: type = READ: start=2147483560 size=1: dev=65024 inode=36110346 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(1054) set_posix_lock: Real lock: Type = READ: offset = 2147483560, count = 1 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(650) posix_fcntl_lock 25 13 2147483560 1 0 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1621) fcntl_lock 25 13 2147483560 1 0 [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1656) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(680) posix_fcntl_lo...

...m(508) yyctpa1f (204.50.11.40) closed connection to service ibmlaser [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(40) Yielding connection to ibmlaser [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(40) Yelding connection to STATUS. 1998/10/07 08:37:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(4339) fcntl_lock 10 35 0 1 2 [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(4400) Lock call successful [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(4339) fcntl_lock 10 35 0 1 3 [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(4400) Lock call successful [1998/10/07 08:37:56, 6] lib/util.c:wr...

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0] tdb/...