search for: fcnan

...crash me. It came up because the JITter will call ConstantFP::get with the GenericValue arguments passed it, but the above repro is a lot simpler and is independent of the JITter. My call stack looks like this: in here it fails this: assert(category == fcNormal || category == fcNaN); Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::significandParts() Line 360 + 0x39 bytes C++ Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::zeroSignificand() Line 387 + 0x15 bytes C++ Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::APFloat(const llvm::fltSemantics & ourSemantics={...}, unsigned __int...

...crash me. It came up because the JITter will call ConstantFP::get with the GenericValue arguments passed it, but the above repro is a lot simpler and is independent of the JITter. My call stack looks like this: in here it fails this: assert(category == fcNormal || category == fcNaN); Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::significandParts() Line 360 + 0x39 bytes C++ Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::zeroSignificand() Line 387 + 0x15 bytes C++ I've been working in this area and probably introduced this, but I don't see how: zeroSignificand() sets...

...call ConstantFP::get with the GenericValue arguments passed it, but > the above repro is a lot simpler and is independent of the JITter. > > > > My call stack looks like this: > > > > in here it fails this: assert(category == fcNormal || > category == fcNaN); > > Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::significandParts() Line > 360 + 0x39 bytes C++ > > Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::zeroSignificand() Line > 387 + 0x15 bytes C++ I've been working in this area and probably introduced this, but I don't...

...crash me. It came up because the JITter will call ConstantFP::get with the GenericValue arguments passed it, but the above repro is a lot simpler and is independent of the JITter. My call stack looks like this: in here it fails this: assert(category == fcNormal || category == fcNaN); Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::significandParts() Line 360 + 0x39 bytes C++ Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::zeroSignificand() Line 387 + 0x15 bytes C++ I've been working in this area and probably introduced this, but I don't see how: zeroSignificand() sets...

...call ConstantFP::get with the GenericValue arguments passed it, but > the above repro is a lot simpler and is independent of the JITter. > > > > My call stack looks like this: > > > > in here it fails this: assert(category == fcNormal || > category == fcNaN); > > Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::significandParts() Line > 360 + 0x39 bytes C++ > > Fibonacci.exe!llvm::APFloat::zeroSignificand() Line > 387 + 0x15 bytes C++ > > I've been working in this area and probably introduced this, but I...