search for: fcf4cf1c

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "fcf4cf1c".

[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
2019 Jun 10
3
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:32 AM Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 7:16 PM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I'm in the same situation James is in and thus have the same bias but >> I'll +1 that comment nevertheless. I think I prefer using size_t or the
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
2019 Jun 11
2
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
...velopers mailing list >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190611/fcf4cf1c/attachment.html>