Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fce5c75c".
2010 Jul 21
1
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
...e systems might
> suffer a loss of performance due to the need to store union types in memory.
>
Can mem2reg alleviate this problem?
Cheers,
Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100720/fce5c75c/attachment.html>
2010 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>
> >> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
> >> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type
> in
> >> LLVM?
> > I think in its current
2010 Jul 20
4
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
>> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type in
>> LLVM?
> I think in its current state the unions should be removed from LLVM IR
> in next release. It's pretty much unfinished and noone is willing to