Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fcaf545c".
2017 Dec 31
0
Submitting patches for LLVM -- llvm-commits vs. Phabricator?
Yup, Phabricator is generally preferred for patches.
Additionally, are you subscribed to the mailing list? I can't find where I read it now, but I believe your messages are held for moderation if you aren't subscribed. You can subscribe at http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits if needed.
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Christoph Kindl
2017 Dec 30
3
Submitting patches for LLVM -- llvm-commits vs. Phabricator?
Hi,
I've recently submitted a patch to llvm-commits (as requested by https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#making-and-submitting-a-patch) and the mailing list answered with a notice that my message is held for moderator approval (with the reason: "Post by non-member to a members-only list"). I'm therefore wondering if I should've submitted my patch via Phabricator
2018 Jan 02
3
Submitting patches for LLVM -- llvm-commits vs. Phabricator?
...tivity in llvm-commits, it seems that most of the patches are submitted and reviewed by Phabricator).
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180102/fcaf545c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3854 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180102/fcaf545c/attachment.bin>