search for: fbound

Hi Nuno, I noticed your commits related to -fbounds-checking and have some questions. The functionality of this new phase seems to (partially?) overlap with AddressSanitizer and SAFECode, so I am curious how would you compare the two existing tools with the new one. Earlier you wrote: >> So the main idea of this new flag is not for debugging...

On 5/24/12 4:43 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Hi Nuno, > > I noticed your commits related to -fbounds-checking and have some > questions. > The functionality of this new phase seems to (partially?) overlap with > AddressSanitizer and SAFECode, > so I am curious how would you compare the two existing tools with the > new one. Nuno's original goal (described in our first set o...

Hi Kostya, I'm also curious to know where Nuno is going with this, and the details of his design. I'm worried he might be reinventing the wheel. I'm also worried that he may be inventing a square wheel :) > I noticed your commits related to -fbounds-checking and have some questions. > The functionality of this new phase seems to (partially?) overlap with > AddressSanitizer and SAFECode, > so I am curious how would you compare the two existing tools with the new one. > > Earlier you wrote: >> > So the main idea of this...

...o get the this Fortran array bounds check to run on my code as my package has been rejected for failing this test. I read writing R extensions and it appears to run this test I should use a Makevars file with one of the following two flags depending on my compiler: FCFLAGS = -g -O2 -mtune=native -fbounds-check FFLAGS = -g -O2 -mtune=native -fbounds-check and store it in the src subdirectory of my package. I've tried this using each of the above in a Makevars file. It's not giving me the information on where my code is failing the array bounds check and no warnings about problems with my...

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:23 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 5/24/12 5:41 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Kostya, I'm also curious to know where Nuno is going with this, and > the > > details of his design. I'm worried he might be reinventing the wheel. > I'm > > also worried that he may be inventing a square wheel :) > >

On 5/24/12 5:41 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Kostya, I'm also curious to know where Nuno is going with this, and the > details of his design. I'm worried he might be reinventing the wheel. I'm > also worried that he may be inventing a square wheel :) I believe Nuno's goal is to prevent run-time exploitation of software. Nuno, please correct me if I'm wrong. And

I previously sent a cri de coeur about this problem to the r-help list but so far have not managed to extract a solution. So I am trying here. (Uh, Ubuntu *is* a "special instance" of Debian, isn't it?) The problem is that I cannot install rgdal, and I need it. Rather desperately. I do: install.packages("rgdal",lib="/home/rolf/Rlib") and get the error

...n the line 87 in the packet.c file. But it is still "Created at". So I tried to debug it. I installed GDB/DDD and read documentations..... I recompiled openssh with debuging information and without optimization (the problem still exists): $ export CC=/buba/gcc/bin/gcc CFLAGS="-g -fbounds-checking -I/buba/zlib/include" SYSLIBS="-lsocket -lnsl" LDFLAGS="-fbounds-checking" $ ./configure --prefix=/opt/BBKEssh --with-zlib=/buba/zlib/lib --without-rsh --disable-suid-ssh --with-prngd-socket=/var/spool/prngd/pool --without-pam --with-ssl-dir=/opt/BBKEssh I d...