Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "fblah".
Did you mean:
blah
2019 Oct 10
4
Building For x64 Windows using LLVM
I'm trying to do it by passing "-Xclang -m64" on the VS2019 command line options panel but it gives the error "unknown argument" on "-m64". How do I do it? Thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191010/37832cc8/attachment.html>
2018 Apr 04
2
[RFC] Adding function attributes to represent codegen optimization level
...ation level
Would implementing GCC’s ‘__attribute__((optimize(...)))’ help?
I can’t find any good documentation for this attribute, but it seems that GCC supports this in two forms:
__attribute__((optimize(2)))
meaning optimise equivalent to ‘-O2’, and:
__attribute_((optimize("fblah", "O1")))
meaning optimise with the provided discrete options.
MartinO
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of David Blaikie via llvm-dev
Sent: 04 April 2018 15:41
To: mcrosier at codeaurora.org <mailto:mcrosier at codeaurora.or...
2018 Apr 04
0
[RFC] Adding function attributes to represent codegen optimization level
...g GCC’s ‘__attribute__((optimize(...)))’ help?
>
> I can’t find any good documentation for this attribute, but it seems
> that GCC supports this in two forms:
>
> __attribute__((optimize(2)))
>
> meaning optimise equivalent to ‘-O2’, and:
>
> __attribute_((optimize("fblah", "O1")))
>
> meaning optimise with the provided discrete options.
>
> MartinO
>
> *From:*llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of
> *David Blaikie via llvm-dev
> *Sent:* 04 April 2018 15:41
> *To:* mcrosier at codeaurora.org <...
2018 Apr 04
0
[RFC] Adding function attributes to represent codegen optimization level
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:47 PM via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
> All,
> A recent commit, D43040/r324557, changed the behavior of the gold plugin
> when compiling with LTO. The change now causes the codegen optimization
> level to default to CodeGenOpt::Default (i.e., -O2) rather than use the
> LTO optimization level. The argument was made that the LTO
2018 Apr 03
5
[RFC] Adding function attributes to represent codegen optimization level
All,
A recent commit, D43040/r324557, changed the behavior of the gold plugin
when compiling with LTO. The change now causes the codegen optimization
level to default to CodeGenOpt::Default (i.e., -O2) rather than use the
LTO optimization level. The argument was made that the LTO optimization
level should control the amount of cross-module optimizations done by
LTO, but it should not