Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "fbd25b2".
2016 Jan 04
2
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...edhat.com>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> #define wmb() barrier()
> #define dma_rmb() mb()
> #define dma_wmb() mb()
> -#define smp_mb() mb()
> -#define smp_rmb() rmb()
> -#define smp_wmb()...
2016 Jan 04
2
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...edhat.com>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> #define wmb() barrier()
> #define dma_rmb() mb()
> #define dma_wmb() mb()
> -#define smp_mb() mb()
> -#define smp_rmb() rmb()
> -#define smp_wmb()...
2016 Jan 05
3
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
....de>
> > > ---
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > > #define dma_wmb() mb()
> > > -#define sm...
2016 Jan 05
3
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
....de>
> > > ---
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > > #define dma_wmb() mb()
> > > -#define sm...
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...; arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > > > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > > &g...
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...; arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > > > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > > &g...
2015 Dec 31
0
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
#define wmb() barrier()
#define dma_rmb() mb()
#define dma_wmb() mb()
-#define smp_mb() mb()
-#define smp_rmb() rmb()
-#define smp_wmb() wmb()
-
-#define smp_store_release(p, v)...
2016 Jan 04
0
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...rnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > #define wmb() barrier()
> > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > #define dma_wmb() mb()
> > -#define smp_mb() mb()
> > -#define sm...
2016 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
...-
> > > > arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > > #define dma_rmb() mb()
> > > > #define dma_wmb() m...
2016 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v2 22/32] s390: define __smp_xxx
.../asm/barrier.h | 15 +++++++++------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > > index c358c31..fbd25b2 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> > > > > > @@ -26,18 +26,21 @@
> > > > > > #define wmb() barrier()
> > > > > > #define dma_rmb()...
2016 Jan 10
48
[PATCH v3 00/41] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v2:
- extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches
teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers
(__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only),
should help prevent misuse by arch code
to address comments by Russell King
- patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers
as suggested by Stefano Stabellini
- implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh
2016 Jan 10
48
[PATCH v3 00/41] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v2:
- extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches
teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers
(__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only),
should help prevent misuse by arch code
to address comments by Russell King
- patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers
as suggested by Stefano Stabellini
- implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
as suggested by David Miller
- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
as suggested by David Miller
- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't