Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fb7afc797".
Did you mean:
fb7afc797e
2022 Dec 16
1
[PATCH v2 1/6] spec: Recommend cap on NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS length
...e extent. Later, when adding its
> qemu:dirty-bitmap:XYZ context extension (qemu commit 3d068aff16, Jun
> 2018), it added a cap to 128k extents (1M+4 bytes), and that cap was
> applied to base:allocation once qemu started sending multiple extents
> for that context as well (qemu commit fb7afc797e, Jul 2018). Qemu
> extents are never smaller than 512 bytes (other than an exception at
> the end of a file whose size is not aligned to 512), but even so, a
> request for just under 4G of block status could produce 8M extents,
> resulting in a reply of 64M if it were not capped small...
2023 Mar 03
1
[PATCH v2 1/6] spec: Recommend cap on NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS length
...en adding its
> > qemu:dirty-bitmap:XYZ context extension (qemu commit 3d068aff16, Jun
> > 2018), it added a cap to 128k extents (1M+4 bytes), and that cap was
> > applied to base:allocation once qemu started sending multiple extents
> > for that context as well (qemu commit fb7afc797e, Jul 2018). Qemu
> > extents are never smaller than 512 bytes (other than an exception at
> > the end of a file whose size is not aligned to 512), but even so, a
> > request for just under 4G of block status could produce 8M extents,
> > resulting in a reply of 64M if it w...
2023 Apr 13
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] NBD 64-bit extensions (spec only)
v2 was here:
https://lists.debian.org/nbd/2022/11/msg00030.html
The bulk of the changes since then are:
- forbid NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME once extended headers are negotiated (Wouter)
- consistently use 'maximum payload', rather than a haphazard mix of
'maximum block payload' (Vladimir)
At this point, I want to make sure we are happy with the spec before
re-posting patches for