search for: faxu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm experiencing an odd situation on my samba (3.0.9) server (RH 7.3). maybe it is normal, but I prefer to ask... Some smbd processes are not owned by the corresponding user, but by root instead : [root@karma logs]# ps faxu|grep smbd|grep ^root|wc -l 213 [root@karma logs]# ps faxu|grep smbd|grep -v ^root|wc -l 29 but samba view the processes with the right owner [root@karma logs]# smbstatus -p |grep root [root@karma logs]# Is it normal ? Thanks Pierre - -- - --- Retrait? --- Jospin a ?crit de...

...;t test to write files but at least the umask on the process is >> set >> as it seems. >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> > How can I find the value for <http_worker>? > > Emmett W?ith <http_worker> I meant the processes running httpd. Try this: ps faxu | grep http[d] This will give you the list of PIDs and the UID running it. First PID is usually run by root and the children are run by user apache. Regards, Simon

...cess is >>> set >>> as it seems. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> >> How can I find the value for <http_worker>? >> >> Emmett > > W?ith <http_worker> I meant the processes running httpd. Try this: > > ps faxu | grep http[d] > > This will give you the list of PIDs and the UID running it. First PID is > usually run by root and the children are run by user apache. > > Regards, > Simon > That's what I thought, but didn't see any results. I may have had apache stopped becaus...

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the