search for: fauzia

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Naznin Fauzia <laboni14 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Devang and John. My pass is actually a loop pass, not a function > pass. So, I couldnt override the getAnalysisUsage. > A LoopPass is no different from a FunctionPass here. You can use getAnalysisUsage and getAnalysis in a LoopPass. > I...

On 2/28/11 4:43 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Naznin Fauzia wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> How Can I get the Loops around an Instruction? >> >> I know I can get the basic block of an instruction using >> inst.getParent() which returns a BasicBlock*. Now I want to use the >> getLoopFor(BasicBlock) method of the class...

.... Now How can I get the loopInfo from here? I couldn't find helpful methods in the LoopInfo class documents. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:52 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 2/28/11 4:43 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > > On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Naznin Fauzia wrote: > > Hi all, > > How Can I get the Loops around an Instruction? > > I know I can get the basic block of an instruction using inst.getParent() > which returns a BasicBlock*. Now I want to use the getLoopFor(BasicBlock) > method of the class LoopInfo. > But I dont kno...

...need the topological ordering constraint, so I never revisited the > problem. In hindsight, I don't even know if Function guarantees that > they are presented in a topological order, but it always happened to > be the case for me. > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Naznin Fauzia <laboni14 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a question about llvm::LoopBase getBlocks() method. Does it > return > > the basic blocks inside the loop in random order? I need to order the > blocks > > in some valid topological ordering of the...

Hi all, How Can I get the Loops around an Instruction? I know I can get the basic block of an instruction using inst.getParent() which returns a BasicBlock*. Now I want to use the getLoopFor(BasicBlock) method of the class LoopInfo. But I dont know how to get the LoopInfo. BasicBlock* bb = inst.getParent(); (... what should I add here?) Loop* innerloop = LI -> getLoopFor(bb): Thanks.

On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Naznin Fauzia wrote: > Hi all, > > How Can I get the Loops around an Instruction? > > I know I can get the basic block of an instruction using inst.getParent() which returns a BasicBlock*. Now I want to use the getLoopFor(BasicBlock) method of the class LoopInfo. > But I dont know how to get...

...writing later evolved to not need the topological ordering constraint, so I never revisited the problem. In hindsight, I don't even know if Function guarantees that they are presented in a topological order, but it always happened to be the case for me. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Naznin Fauzia <laboni14 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about llvm::LoopBase  getBlocks() method. Does it return > the basic blocks inside the loop in random order? I need to order the blocks > in some valid topological ordering of the AST. If getBlocks() does not do &gt...

...ne iteration and hence use them to update the E-step and again maximaize M-step by using maxLik or optim by contoling the number of limiter and putting the number equals to 1 is it true and acceptance? I mean if I do this my results can be reasonable?. please I am waiting your response. Regards Fauzia Taweab phd.student. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I have a question about llvm::LoopBase getBlocks() method. Does it return the basic blocks inside the loop in random order? I need to order the blocks in some valid topological ordering of the AST. If getBlocks() does not do that, what can I do to find the ordering? Thanks, Naznin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am running into this segmentation fault while running a simple function pass on some C benchmarks Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00000000005c5c00 in AddReachableCodeToWorklist(llvm::BasicBlock*, llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::BasicBlock*, 64u>&, llvm::InstCombiner&, llvm::TargetData const*) () What can be the possible reasons of the segmentation fault here?