Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "fauto".
Did you mean:
auto
2013 Oct 01
3
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
...nclude/clang/Driver/Options.td
@@ -351,6 +351,10 @@ def fno_autolink : Flag <["-"], "fno-autolink">,
Group<f_Group>,
Flags<[DriverOption, CC1Option]>,
HelpText<"Disable generation of linker directives for automatic
library linking">;
+def fauto_profile : Flag<["-"], "fauto-profile">, Group<f_Group>,
+ Flags<[DriverOption, CC1Option]>,
+ HelpText<"Enable automatic profile guided optimizations">;
+
def fblocks : Flag<["-"], "fblocks">, Group<f_Group>...
2013 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
You are calling the option -auto-profile in some places and
-fauto-profile in others. Maybe it is just a typo?
On 1 October 2013 15:31, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to add a new option to clang to enable my auto profile
> pass. I've added this to Options.td and Driver/Tools.cpp, but I'm not
> getting the o...
2013 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are calling the option -auto-profile in some places and
> -fauto-profile in others. Maybe it is just a typo?
In opt, the option is named '-auto-profile' when I instantiate the pass:
INITIALIZE_PASS(AutoProfile, "auto-profile", "Auto Profile loader", false,
false)
Do I need to name it fauto-profile as well?
I'm...
2013 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
...ssuming that is the effect you want).
On 1 October 2013 15:48, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Rafael Espíndola
> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You are calling the option -auto-profile in some places and
>> -fauto-profile in others. Maybe it is just a typo?
>
> In opt, the option is named '-auto-profile' when I instantiate the pass:
>
> INITIALIZE_PASS(AutoProfile, "auto-profile", "Auto Profile loader", false,
> false)
>
> Do I need to name it...
2015 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] RFC - Stop ignoring -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
On 2015 Jun 17, at 13:53, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> The flags -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use are currently ignored
> for GCC compatibility. I would like to enable them and give them
> similar semantics to GCC. These flags are baked pretty deeply into
> our build environment, so supporting them at the driver level will
> make our lives a lot