search for: faustus

...C++ app? Am I just simply nuts? How much pain am I setting myself up for? As an example of why I'm interested, this is the ugly rule I can use currently for half-assed realtime replication: RULE ^/home/mike/test RETRY 5 TIMEOUT 300 IGNORE \.Xauthority OPENW rsync --rsh=ssh -a _FILE_ faustus:/mirrors/otto_FILE_ MKDIR rsync --rsh=ssh -a _FILE_ faustus:/mirrors/otto_FILE_ SYMLINK rsync --rsh=ssh -a _NEW_FILE_ faustus:/mirrors/otto_NEW_FILE_ UNLINK ssh faustus rm -f /mirrors/otto_FILE_ RMDIR ssh faustus rmdir /mirrors/otto_FILE_ RENAME ssh faustus "rm /mirrors/otto/_OLD_FILE_...

...fically, I want to stub out the method ''exists?'' to return true when its called twice. Again, it worked fine in all rails versions up to 2.0.2, and only fails with rails 2.0.2... Is it me? -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert http://www.codeheadsystems.com/blog/ "Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe

...an easily argue that I''m likely making my test case too complicated if I have to do this, but we found an esoteric bug on a short-lived object and having a test to check for this specific case would help make sure that bug stays away.) -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert "Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe Discere docendo...

We''re encountering a failure with Mocha 0.5.6. We had this expectation: game_version.expects(:attributes=).with(:game_file => kind_of(GameFile), :game_id => @game.id) This expectation was passing with 0.5.5, but fails with 0.5.6. I added this test to parameter_matcher_acceptance_test.rb, which passes in 0.5.5 and fails in 0.5.6 def test_should_match_nested_parameters

Has anybody been using Mocha trunk over the last month or two? I''ve done quite a bit of internal refactoring and wondered whether anyone had any problems. There are also a bunch of new features e.g. states, sequences, extra parameter matchers & configurable warnings, but these are not documented in the on-line rdoc. I wondered if anyone has been looking at the rdoc in trunk and

...mode. I guess it looks for some kind of success state, but i don't know what it is expecting to find. Does anyone know something about this? I've also seen that standard nvidiafb under linux does not try to do a similar test. Greeting, Alessandro -- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -Dr. Faustus - Marlowe Public GPG Key ID 0x650B3ED9 on subkeys.gpg.net Key Fingerprint 6243 AAD3 E3EC 52D8 DFAA 2A2F 9FCD 0457 650B 3ED9 Encrypted mails are welcome -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes D...

Hi everone, does anyone know about which registers are mapped at offset 0xC000 in MMIO? I'm an looking especially for regs 0xc014 and 0xc030 Greetings, Alessandro -- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -Dr. Faustus - Marlowe Public GPG Key ID 0x650B3ED9 on subkeys.gpg.net Key Fingerprint 6243 AAD3 E3EC 52D8 DFAA 2A2F 9FCD 0457 650B 3ED9 Encrypted mails are welcome -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes D...

Hello to everyone, I have a problem that is giving me a headache, and trying to do a project in Ruby on Rails and I need to connect with a Data Base that is en Postgres, the truth is that I didn’t think that it was so hard to connect a DB with postgres because I was working with Msyql and everything was easy. This are the thinks that I have install in my computer. 1. Debian GNU/Linux, kernel

Hi folks. So I''m using mocha on a ruby project, and I really like it. One thing I''ve noticed is that it can be a bit "surprising" when I''m mocking methods that don''t exist on an object, and I think there''s an easyish fix. At the moment, you use sheep = mock() to create a mock sheep. What I''d like to do is something like sheep =