search for: fatooh

...fwmark values: 0, 1 and 2. So, I wrote an alternative hash function. It''s quite simple, and as long as the range of input values is smaller than the hash table (default 1024, up to 16384), collisions will not happen at all. See the updated README file for more details. Home page: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ Direct URL: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.13.tar.gz README (also available in the tar.gz): http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README Try it out, have fun, and if you find a bug or have a suggestion please send me an email. -Corey

http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.12-rc1.tar.gz This version no longer interferes with the original SFQ; unlike previous versions, you can still use an unpatched tc with SFQ. Patching tc is still needed for ESFQ, though. I''ve tested this patch with Linux 2.6.11 as well. P...

...are just as likely to collide as 1.2.3.4 and 56.78.90.123. The src_direct, dst_direct, and fwmark_direct hash type hacks are no longer useful, and I intend to deprecate them in the next release. Send me an email if you have a reason I should leave the *_direct hash types alone. Home page: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ Direct URL: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.19.2.tar.gz README (also available in the tar.gz): http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README Try it out, have fun, and if you find a bug or have a suggestion please send me an email. -Corey

Hello, I haven''t been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this list, but I''ve still been working on the patch. If you''re curious about recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/ChangeLog http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README Meanwhile, I''m interested in finally getting ESFQ included in the Linux kernel. Before I start sending patches and requesting maintainer review, however, there''s one question I wa...

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is

Hello I am using htb (krenel 2.6.14.3 + esfq patch from fatooh.org) to limit the bandwidth. But I want the absolute maximum rate to be for example 5Mbit and not to exceed it. here is the script: $tc qdisc add dev ${NETIF} root handle 1 htb r2q 4 $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1: classid 1:21 htb rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1:21...

On 2025-01-10 09:57, Jim Knoble wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: >> >> To address this, modify ssh-add to: >> * [...] >> * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 > > When Damien wrote: > >> Adding a new exit status for the >> no-keys-in-agent case would be >> acceptable too I think. > > I i...

Corey Hickey wrote in <38d76f8e-0744-4bc5-b6e1-db7197e19ad7 at fatooh.org>: |On 2025-01-10 09:57, Jim Knoble wrote: |>> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: |>> |>> To address this, modify ssh-add to: |>> * [...] |>> * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 |> |> When Damien wrote...

...figured that esfq with "hash src" would be a more fair allocation of bandwidth than sfq. Unfortunately, there didn''t seem to be a recent patch for 2.6, so I endeavored to build one. The three patches I made (described below) are available within the attached tar.bz2 or at: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ 1. I downloaded the combined esfq + imq patch from Jim diGriz''s QoS Script, at: http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ 2. I don''t know anything about IMQ, so I extracted the parts that relate to esfq and madified the patch to apply cleanly to 2.6.4. The...

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: > > To address this, modify ssh-add to: > * [...] > * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 When Damien wrote: > Adding a new exit status for the > no-keys-in-agent case would be > acceptable too I think. I interpreted that as "make ssh-add exit with stat...

Hi! I''m getting this error while I try to compile iproute2-2.6.11-050330: gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -I../include -DRESOLVE_HOSTNAMES -DCONFIG_GACT -DCONFIG_GACT_PROB -c -o q_esfq.o q_esfq.c q_esfq.c: In function `esfq_parse_opt'': q_esfq.c:45: error: structure has no member named `hash_kind'' q_esfq.c:45: error: `TCA_SFQ_HASH_CLASSIC''

Hello all, I´ve read http://lartc.org/howto/ and now i am just confused, i think my skills with linux are not very good, so asking for help. I have a linux box with two ethernets cards eth0(gateway 1mb) with is the host for some sites and emails and eth1(nat interface) with provide internet acess to other 5 pcs. I would like to limit the bandwith 512 k for the eth0 and 512 k for eth1 however

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

i have been googling and reading the docs on how to set up a fair que that gives each user or client ip equal bandwidth. most, if not all, i find are examples how to prioritize by the type of traffic such as ssh, http, ftp, smtp, and various p2p. is it possible to set up cues for each ip on the subnet where each user gets a fair turn. i would probably have to set the max bandwidth and total

Hello list. Yesterday i ask Corey Hickey (maintainer a patch for the original SFQ - http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/) about ESFQ perspectives and got your answer: > I do not intend to develop ESFQ any further, since I now maintain a > patch for the original SFQ. As for getting that merged into the kernel, > that will probably happen eventually, but I haven't had much time or > motiv...

I have a block of IP addresses (2048) used for ADSL connections to customers. In order to provide a fair slice of available bandwidth on the contended services I would like to be able to set up some kind of SFQ filter, but using a hash of the destination IP address rather than the the full source and destination ip and port. This would be done at the Internet side gateway for traffic being

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Corey Hickey wrote: > On 2025-01-10 01:35, Jochen Bern wrote: > > On 10.01.25 00:33, Corey Hickey wrote: > > > I took the approach of preserving current behavior by default, but > > > another approach would be to: > > > * print "The agent has no identities." to stderr instead of stdout > > > * exit with a status of 0

Hi, I have the my gateway with load balancing traffic going out over two providers. Web browsing is fine...working great. But, my clients (office staff) complains that MSN keeps disconnecting (in 5 mins). Why? Please help me... Regards, ro0ot