search for: fatal_f

...ost."); } else xextendf(&msg1, "", "."); - fp = sshkey_fingerprint(host_key, options.fingerprint_hash, SSH_FP_DEFAULT); ra = sshkey_fingerprint(host_key, options.fingerprint_hash, SSH_FP_RANDOMART); if (fp == NULL || ra == NULL) fatal_f("sshkey_fingerprint failed"); + if (cert) { + cafp = sshkey_fingerprint(cert->cert->signature_key, + options.fingerprint_hash, SSH_FP_DEFAULT); + if (cafp == NULL) + fatal_f("sshkey_fingerprint failed"); + xextendf(&msg1, "\n", "%s...

...check: void mm_request_receive(int sock, struct sshbuf *m) { u_char buf[4], *p = NULL; u_int msg_len; int r; debug3_f("entering"); if (atomicio(read, sock, buf, sizeof(buf)) != sizeof(buf)) { if (errno == EPIPE) cleanup_exit(255); fatal_f("read: %s", strerror(errno)); } Questions: - Is this the expected exit point of `sshd -i` ? - If so, is there a reason to return a failure exit status? Thanks! Donald -- Donald Buczek buczek at molgen.mpg.de Tel: +49 30 8413 1433

...+ long long interval_ns, fuzz_ns; + + interval_ns = interval_ms * (1000LL * 1000); + fuzz_ns = (interval_ns * interval_fuzz_pct) / 100; + /* Center fuzz around requested interval */ + if (fuzz_ns > INT_MAX) + fuzz_ns = INT_MAX; + if (fuzz_ns > interval_ns) { + /* Shouldn't happen */ + fatal_f("internal error: fuzz %u%% %lldns > interval %lldns", + interval_fuzz_pct, fuzz_ns, interval_ns); + } + interval_ns -= fuzz_ns / 2; + interval_ns += arc4random_uniform(fuzz_ns); + + tmp.tv_sec = interval_ns / (1000 * 1000 * 1000); + tmp.tv_nsec = interval_ns % (1000 * 1000 * 1000)...

...list(criteria, arg, 0) == 1; + if (r == (negate ? 1 : 0)) + this_result = result = 0; + } else if (strcasecmp(attrib, "remotecommand") == 0) { + if (rcommand != NULL && sshbuf_len(rcommand) > 0) { + if ((criteria = + sshbuf_dup_string(rcommand)) == NULL) + fatal_f("dup command failed"); + } else if (options->remote_command != NULL) + criteria = xstrdup(options->remote_command); + else + criteria = xstrdup("none"); + r = match_pattern_list(criteria, arg, 0) == 1; + if (r == (negate ? 1 : 0)) + this_result = result =...

... and I guess your next question will be about compilation environment, so: ``` $ gcc --version gcc (Gentoo 13.2.1_p20240210 p14) 13.2.1 20240210 Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ``` I'm running on gentoo. I tested that the

...list(criteria, arg, 0) == 1; + if (r == (negate ? 1 : 0)) + this_result = result = 0; + } else if (strcasecmp(attrib, "remotecommand") == 0) { + if (rcommand != NULL && sshbuf_len(rcommand) > 0) { + if ((criteria = + sshbuf_dup_string(rcommand)) == NULL) + fatal_f("dup command failed"); + } else if (options->remote_command != NULL) + criteria = xstrdup(options->remote_command); + else + criteria = xstrdup("none"); + r = match_pattern_list(criteria, arg, 0) == 1; + if (r == (negate ? 1 : 0)) + this_result = result =...

Hey there, I often want different behavior in my ssh client depending on whether I'm logging into an interactive session or running a remote non-interactive command. We can see at, say, https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/499562/305714 that this isn't a unique wish, and existing solutions are kind of baroque. Typical reasons to do this are to immediately go into a screen or tmux session; for